CBDT clarifies
applicability of 'representative assessee' provisions u/s 160 to official
assignees and their classification in the appropriate category of 'person' as
defined u/s 2(31) of the Income-tax Act; States that since official assignees
do not receive income or manage property on behalf of debtor, they cannot be
considered as representative assessee of debtors u/s 160(1)(iii) while
computing tax liability arising from estate of debtors; Further clarifies that
the status of official assignee is that of 'artificial juridical person' as
prescribed u/s 2(31)(vii); Thus states that official assignee is required to
file income-tax return electronically in the ITR Form applicable to 'artificial
juridical person' separately for each of the estate of the insolvent and income
shall be taxed as per the rates applicable to an 'artificial juridical person';
Further, requires official assignee to obtain a separate PAN for each of the
estate of the insolvent
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Bombay High Court Clarifies Tax Exemption Eligibility for Venture Capital Funds
In a significant ruling, the Bombay High Court has reaffirmed that a Venture Capital Fund (VCF) registered with SEBI is entitled to claim ...
-
Slump sale is transfer of one or more business undertakings for a lump sum consideration, without assigning individual values to the each...
-
A new website launched for TDS related matters www.tdscpc.gov.in TRACES – T DS R econciliation A nalysis and C orrection E nabling S yste...
-
Facts Centrica India Offshore Private Limited (CIO), an Indian Company, is a wholly owned subsidiary of Centrica Plc, UK Centrica Plc a...
-
The Tax Audit season has started and it’s the time when the Assessees rush to their Chartered Accountants (CA) to get their Tax Audit d...
-
SREI Infrastructure Finance Ltd vs. ITSC (Delhi High Court) The assessee entered into a scheme of arrangement u/s 391-394 of the Compani...
-
Facts The taxpayer, a partnership firm, derived income from the business of handling and transport of ship containers, customs clearing a...
-
M/s. Alpha Projects Society P. Ltd vs. DCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad) In AY 2005-06, the assessee made payments to contractors & for professi...
-
01. TDS u/s 194J is required to be done for Royalty also w.e.f 13-7-2006. 02. Royalty had been defined under explanation 2 of se...
-
F.No.354/66/2011-TRU Government of India Ministry of Finance Department of Revenue Central Board of Excise & Customs...
-
M/s. Merilyn Shipping & Transports vs. ACIT (ITAT Visakhapatnam Special Bench) The assessee incurred brokerage expenses of Rs.38....
No comments:
Post a Comment