Bombay HC dismisses
Revenue’s appeal against ITAT’s order allowing Sec. 10B benefit to
assessee-firm (a 100% EOU), engaged in manufacturing of diamond studded gold
jewellery, rules that absence of plant and machinery would not lead to a
conclusion that there was no ‘manufacturing’ activity; During subject AY
2010-11, AO had denied deduction on the ground that no manufacturing
activity was carried out by assessee as there was no machinery available at its
premises, as also a small amount of labour charges were incurred as against the
large turnover; HC notes that as per ITAT’s findings, the Government had
granted permission to assessee to manufacture handmade jewellery, and that the
process of making diamond studded jewellery does not require machinery; Also on
the quantum of labour charges and wages being the basis of disallowance, HC
refers to ITAT’s finding that the Revenue had not carried out any examination /
enquiry to ascertain what would be the fair market value of the labour charges
and wages in this sort of activity; Thus, HC holds that view taken by the
Tribunal is one of finding of fact and is a possible view, which does not give
rise to any substantial question of law.:HC
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Bombay High Court Clarifies Tax Exemption Eligibility for Venture Capital Funds
In a significant ruling, the Bombay High Court has reaffirmed that a Venture Capital Fund (VCF) registered with SEBI is entitled to claim ...
-
Slump sale is transfer of one or more business undertakings for a lump sum consideration, without assigning individual values to the each...
-
A new website launched for TDS related matters www.tdscpc.gov.in TRACES – T DS R econciliation A nalysis and C orrection E nabling S yste...
-
Facts Centrica India Offshore Private Limited (CIO), an Indian Company, is a wholly owned subsidiary of Centrica Plc, UK Centrica Plc a...
-
The Tax Audit season has started and it’s the time when the Assessees rush to their Chartered Accountants (CA) to get their Tax Audit d...
-
SREI Infrastructure Finance Ltd vs. ITSC (Delhi High Court) The assessee entered into a scheme of arrangement u/s 391-394 of the Compani...
-
Facts The taxpayer, a partnership firm, derived income from the business of handling and transport of ship containers, customs clearing a...
-
M/s. Alpha Projects Society P. Ltd vs. DCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad) In AY 2005-06, the assessee made payments to contractors & for professi...
-
01. TDS u/s 194J is required to be done for Royalty also w.e.f 13-7-2006. 02. Royalty had been defined under explanation 2 of se...
-
F.No.354/66/2011-TRU Government of India Ministry of Finance Department of Revenue Central Board of Excise & Customs...
-
M/s. Merilyn Shipping & Transports vs. ACIT (ITAT Visakhapatnam Special Bench) The assessee incurred brokerage expenses of Rs.38....
No comments:
Post a Comment