Chennai ITAT denies
assessee-partner’s claim of estimating income on presumptive basis u/s. 44AD
with respect to interest and remuneration earned from the partnership firms
during AY 2012-13; While filing return of income, assessee had applied
presumptive rate @ 8% u/s 44AD on interest and remuneration received from
various partnership firms, however, AO had denied the claim on the ground
that assessee was not doing any business independently but was only a partner
in the firms; Referring to Sec. 28(v) read with Section 40(b), ITAT
acknowledges that remuneration and interest received from a firm, to the extent
eligible u/s 40(b), would be considered as ‘profits and gains from business or
profession’ of the recipient partner; However, ITAT clarifies that “This by
itself…would not translate such remuneration and interest, to gross receipts or
turnover …of a business independently carried on by a partner.”; ITAT opines
that the intention of insertion of Sec. 44AD was to help small business to
comply with the taxation provisions and that the “Intention was not at all to
construe a partner’s remuneration or interest as business income.”:ITAT
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Bombay High Court Clarifies Tax Exemption Eligibility for Venture Capital Funds
In a significant ruling, the Bombay High Court has reaffirmed that a Venture Capital Fund (VCF) registered with SEBI is entitled to claim ...
-
Slump sale is transfer of one or more business undertakings for a lump sum consideration, without assigning individual values to the each...
-
A new website launched for TDS related matters www.tdscpc.gov.in TRACES – T DS R econciliation A nalysis and C orrection E nabling S yste...
-
Facts Centrica India Offshore Private Limited (CIO), an Indian Company, is a wholly owned subsidiary of Centrica Plc, UK Centrica Plc a...
-
The Tax Audit season has started and it’s the time when the Assessees rush to their Chartered Accountants (CA) to get their Tax Audit d...
-
SREI Infrastructure Finance Ltd vs. ITSC (Delhi High Court) The assessee entered into a scheme of arrangement u/s 391-394 of the Compani...
-
Facts The taxpayer, a partnership firm, derived income from the business of handling and transport of ship containers, customs clearing a...
-
M/s. Alpha Projects Society P. Ltd vs. DCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad) In AY 2005-06, the assessee made payments to contractors & for professi...
-
01. TDS u/s 194J is required to be done for Royalty also w.e.f 13-7-2006. 02. Royalty had been defined under explanation 2 of se...
-
F.No.354/66/2011-TRU Government of India Ministry of Finance Department of Revenue Central Board of Excise & Customs...
-
M/s. Merilyn Shipping & Transports vs. ACIT (ITAT Visakhapatnam Special Bench) The assessee incurred brokerage expenses of Rs.38....
No comments:
Post a Comment