The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Mumbai Bench, has recently delivered an Order in the matter of Ecospace IT Park Pvt. Ltd. (“Applicant Company”), clarifying the scope of modifications to Schemes of amalgamation after its approval, especially with regard to amendments in accounting treatment under the Companies Act, 2013.
The Applicant Company, which had earlier obtained NCLT approval for the merger
of its wholly owned subsidiary, approached the Tribunal seeking to amend the
sanctioned Scheme, pertaining to the accounting methodology, from the “Business
Combination Method” to the “Asset Purchase (Asset Acquisition) Method” in line
with accounting practices followed by its corporate group and as mandated by
its parent entity in Singapore.
While deliberating on the above matter, the NCLT had the following key
observations:
- The
NCLT noted that post-sanction modifications to a Scheme are allowed under
Section 231 of the Companies Act, 2013, as well as Rule 17 of the
Companies (Compromises, Arrangements and Amalgamations) Rules, 2016,
provided they do not alter the fundamental structure of the scheme.
- The
Supreme Court ruling in S.K. Gupta & Ors. v. K.P. Jain & Ors. was
relied upon, emphasizing that amendments can be made so long as the core
fabric of the scheme remains intact.
- The
need to change the accounting method from Business Combination to Asset
Acquisition arose from the current auditor's insistence on compliance with
Indian Accounting Standards (Ind AS) and alignment with the parent
company’s accounting policies.
- The
Registrar of Companies raised concerns about the delay in identifying the
accounting difference and the auditor's assertion after scheme sanction;
however, the NCLT acknowledged that the Scheme provided for amendments
with NCLT approval.
- It
was observed that the proposed change in accounting method would not
affect the rights of shareholders or creditors and would keep the
amalgamation tax-neutral under the Income Tax Act.
Based on the above considerations, the NCLT held that the proposed change in accounting treatment was permissible, aligned with Ind AS, and did not affect the core structure of the amalgamation.
This ruling confirms that a scheme of arrangement or amalgamation, once sanctioned by the NCLT, may be amended post-approval, provided such modifications do not alter the Scheme’s core structure and is necessary for its effective implementation. It also reaffirms that group-level financial reporting requirements and regulatory harmonisation may constitute valid grounds for a limited post-sanction amendment.
No comments:
Post a Comment