Thursday, 5 April 2012

S. 220(6): AO reminded that he is not mere “tax gatherer” & cautioned to follow guidelines for recovery of tax


Rajasthani Sammelan Sarvoday vs. ADIT (Bombay High Court)


The assessee, a public charitable trust, filed a ROI returning Nil income. The AO passed a s. 143(3) assessment order holding that the assessee was not eligible for s. 11 exemption on the ground that the receipt of donations by it amounted to a commercial activity and assessed its total income at Rs. 3.51 crores. The assessee filed an application for stay u/s 220(6). Without dealing with the stay application, the AO directed the assessee to pay the demand within 3 days and threatened coercive proceedings in the event of failure. The assessee filed an application before the DIT who directed it to pay 50% of the demand by March 2012 and the balance in installments. No reasons were given on why the stay application was not acceded to. The assessee filed a Writ Petition to challenge the direction: HELD by the High Court:

No comments:

ITC is available on GST charged on advances - High Court

  This is to update you about an important decision by Bombay High Court (‘ HC ’ / ‘ Court ’) in the case of L&T IHI Consortium v. UOI,...