Wednesday, 2 May 2012

S. 147 reopening reasons need not be supplied within limitation period

A. G. Holdings Pvt. Ltd vs. ITO (Delhi High Court)


For AY 2004-05, the AO issued a notice u/s 148 on 15.3.2011. The recorded reasons were supplied to the assessee on 30.8.2011 (after the expiry of the limitation period of 6 years). The assessee, relying on Haryana Acrylic vs. CIT 308 ITR 38 (Del), challenged the reopening inter alia on the ground that as the recorded reasons were supplied after the expiry of the limitation period, the reassessment proceedings were invalid. HELD dismissing the petition:

No comments:

Commission Paid to Overseas Sourcing Agents Not Taxable as FTS; No Witholding Obligation

  Delhi ITAT held that commission paid by an exporter to an overseas sourcing agent for procurement of export orders and follow-up on realis...