In the instant case, two moot questions were
raised before the ITAT which were as under:
A. Liability of tax deduction on overseas
commission
B. Whether website development charges were
deductible as revenue expenditure ?
On first issue, it held in favour
of assessee as under:
1) Commission paid to non-residents for
services rendered outside India does not accrue or arise in India;
2) Hence, no TDS was deductible from such
commission and such commission couldn’t be disallowed under section
40(a)(i);
3) Even if services rendered by the
non-resident did fall within the definition of "fees for technical services, the
commission paid would not be taxable in India as clause(b) of section 9(1)(vii)
would save the assessee.
On second issue, it held in favour of assessee
as under:
1) Expenses incurred for upgradation of an
existing website ought to be distinguished from expenses for development of a
new website;
2) The former was revenue expenditure and the
latter was capital expenditure, resulting in creation of an intangible
asset;
3) Expenditure on upgradation of existing
website was equivalent to maintenance of an existing asset. Thus, it was revenue
expenditure - MAHINDRA HOLIDAYS & RESORTS INDIA LTD. V. JCIT (LTU) (2013) 38
taxmann.com 207
(Chennai - Trib.)
No comments:
Post a Comment