THE issues before the Bench are - Whether interest on refund
u/s 244A, is to be granted on on the sum after adjustment of MAT
credit first and then Advance Tax and TDS and Whether carry forward MAT
credit available to the assessee is to be adjusted first, before charging
interest under sections 234B and 234C. And the case is remanded to the
AO.
Facts of the
case
Held
that,
++ a
reading of the order passed on 28.02.2005 giving effect to the order of ITAT
reveals that on the total tax liability of Rs.2,06,96,452/-, the adjusted MAT
credit under Section 115JAA of the Act leaves the tax payable at
Rs.1,23,22,793/-, after deducting TDS Rs.1,72,90,710/- the Assessing Officer had
shown the refund due as Rs.49,67,917/-. The assessee in its appeal before the
CIT(A) apparently sought for interest on the amount of refund due as per Section
244A contending that the Assessing Officer had not granted interest while
refunding excess TDS. It pointed out that as per Section 244A of the Act,
interest has to be granted upto the date of refund. To that end, the assessee
relied on the decision in the case of CIT Vs. T.V.Sundaram Iyengar and Sons
Ltd., reported in 236 ITR 524. The CIT(A), however rejected the appeal holding
that MAT credit allowed would not bear any interest; consequently, the Assessing
Officer did not grant any interest on the MAT credit. On appeal preferred before
the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, the Tribunal, however referred to the
decision in the case of Chemplast Sanmar Ltd. Vs. DCIT reported in (2004) (83
TTJ Chennai 427) and allowed the assessee's case;
++ as
far as the decision 2009-TIOL-206-HC-MAD-IT relating
to CIT Vs. Chemplast Sanmar Limited, which was an appeal against the Income Tax
Appellate Tribunal before this Court is concerned, the issue was as to whether
the Tribunal was right in holding that carry forward MAT credit available to the
assessee was to be adjusted first, before charging interest under sections 234B
and 234C of the Act. Confirming the view of the Tribunal, this Court held that
credit under Section 115JAA only should be given effect to and not to the tax
and interest therefor and that interest under Sections 234A, 234B and 234C
should be given after giving MAT credit under Section 115JAA. In so holding in
favour of the assessee, this Court referred to the decision of the Delhi High
Court in the case of CIT Vs. Jindal Exports Ltd., 2009-TIOL-69-HC-DEL-IT holding that the credit
under Section 115JAA should be given effect to before charging of interest under
Sections 234A, 234B and 234C. This was confirmed by the Apex Court in the
decision 2010-TIOL-114-SC-IT-LB in the case of CIT Vs.
Tulsyan Nec Ltd.,
++
thus the issue before this Court is totally different from what was considered
in the case of Commissioner of Income-Tax Vs. Chemplast Sanmar Limited,Chemplast
Sanmar 2009-TIOL-206-HC-MAD-IT;
consequently, we do not think the decisions would be safely relied on by either
parties before us. As is evident from the reading of the order of the Assessing
Officer dated 28.02.2005, the assessee became entitled to refund consequent upon
the deduction given on MAT credit and the TDS. Thus, going by the factual
details, the assessee is entitled to a refund of Rs.49,67,917/- and the
deduction on TDS itself was before granting or charging any interest under any
provisions of the Act. Hence, we hold that the proper course herein would be to
remand the matter back to the Assessing Officer to work out interest on the
refund payable to the assessee on the sum of Rs.49,67,917/- as ordered in the
order of the Assistant Commissioner dated 28.02.2005 in accordance with Section
244A.
No comments:
Post a Comment