Old Rules of APB Opinion No. 17 (Before superseded by SFAS No. 142) |
Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 17 a. Intangible Assets b. Issued in August 1970 c. APB Opinion No. 17: Superseded by SFAS No. 142, June 2001 Intangible assets acquired from others (companies or individuals) a. Cost of acquisition --> recorded on the balance sheet as intangible assets b. Amortized over the periods of benefits --> not to exceed 40 years Intangible assets not specifically identifiable a. Cost of developing such intangible assets --> charged to income when incurred. b. Internally developed intangible assets --> not recognized as an asset on the balance sheet. Amortization of intangible assets a. Intangible assets --> amortized over the periods of benefits. b. The period of amortization --> should not exceed forty years. c. It is assumed that --> the value of intangible assets will eventually disappear. |
Wednesday, 10 December 2014
SIN 142 under US GAAP.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
CBDT issues second round of frequently asked questions in relation to Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024
This Tax Alert summarizes Circular No. 19/2024 dated 16 December 2024 (VSV 2- December Circular) issued by the Central Board of Direct Tax...
-
PCIT vs. The Executor of Estate of Late Smt. Manjula A. Shah (Bombay High Court) S. 50C Capital Gains: The valuation of the stamp autho...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Supreme Court (SC) [1] on availability of CENVAT Credit on mobile towers and pre-fabrica...
-
IFRS and US GAAP - Similarities and Differences What is IFRS? And what is GAAP? The main difference between IFRS and US GAAP is that G...
-
Madras HC reverses ITAT's order, grants deduction u/s. 80P(2)(a)(i) to assessee (a society engaged in the business of banking and provi...
-
SC dismisses assessee-company’s SLP challenging Bombay HC order upholding re-assessment initiation (beyond 4 yrs period) based on a special...
-
SC dismisses Revenue’s SLP challenging Bombay HC order in case of assessee (belonging to Lodha group of companies engaged in real estate bu...
-
Claiming a foreign tax credit (FTC) in Australia allows companies to offset foreign taxes paid on income earned overseas against their Aust...
-
HC allows HDFC Bank’s writ petition, quashes AO’s order and subsequent reference to TPO alleging that certain related party transactions [p...
-
Delhi ITAT deletes Rs. 1558.57 cr. capital gains addition on Telenor India for AY 2014-15, holds that set off of non-refundable entry fee p...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Bombay High Court (HC)1 on admissibility of input tax credit (ITC) w.r.t GST on advance p...
No comments:
Post a Comment