Tulip Global Pvt. Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Jaipur-I 2014 (36) STR 1083 (TrL - Del.)
FACTS:
The appellants had asked repeatedly for extension to file reply to SCN on account of change in counsel and also in order to procure orders passed by other Authorities in respect of their distributors. During personal hearings, they appeared and prayed for extension of time. The Adjudication Authority, without accepting or rejecting their requests, passed ex parte order.
HELD:
The Tribunal observed that as per recording of personal hearing, the appellants appeared and requested for extension of time to file reply to SCN. There was nothing on record regarding acceptance or rejection of such request from the Adjudicating Authority.
If the assessee appears at each hearing and requests for extension of time, Adjudicating Authority is under a legal obligation to respond to the said request either by extending the period or by rejecting the request. Non- communication regarding such request may be regarded as acceptance by the assessee. Since in the present case, principle of natural justice was violated, the matter was remanded back for fresh adjudication after providing reasonable opportunity of hearing.
No comments:
Post a Comment