Thursday 14 May 2015

Once the appeal is filed by paying pre-deposit amount of 7.5%

TlOL-193-CESTAT-MUM Kala Mines and Minerals vs. CC, CE & ST [2015]
Once the appeal is filed by paying pre-deposit amount of 7.5% of the tax demand in terms of section 35F of CEA, 1944 and appeal is pending before the Tribunal, there was no need for freezing the bank accounts.
FACTS:
The Appellant complied with the provisions of section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944 while filing appeal. DGCEI wrote a letter to the bankers of the Appellant to remit the amounts lying with the bank to the Government exchequer, in pursuance to which, the bankers froze the bank accounts.
HELD:
In our considered view and as also statutorily once mandatory deposit of 7.5% is made, there is no reason for recovery of any further amount from the appellant and the action of the Dy. Director, DGCEI seems to be beyond the scope of law.

No comments:

Department of Commerce issues clarification on newly inserted Rule 11B of SEZ Rules

  This Tax Alert summarizes a recent instruction  issued by the SEZ Division, Department of Commerce, clarifying various concerns relating t...