Friday, 29 May 2015

If one senior officer interpreted the law in a manner favourable to the assessee the assessee

IFB Industries Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise Chandigrarh. [2015]37 STR 52 ( Tri. Del )
If one senior officer interpreted the law in a manner favourable to the assessee the assessee connoted be said to have malafide intension for invoking the extended period of limitation.
FACTS:
The Appellant Engaged in trading activities was also offering free warranty for limited period and thereafter undertaking the job of maintenance and repair of product sold.
The Services provided during warranty were exempt service and after warranty were taxable Revenue entertained a view that the   CENVAT Credit only to the extent of an amount not exceeding 20% o service tax was available.
The department held that 20% restriction on availment of CENVAT credit was not applicable in respect of sale of service as also for taxable services of maintenance and repair.
The order of additional commissioner was reviewed by the Commissioner and the 20% restriction was imposed.
HELD:
Appeal can be disposed off as the Additional Commissioner had interpreted the provisions in favour of the assessee. When one senior officer of the department is dropping the demand by interpreting a particular provision of law, the assessee cannot be held guilty for adopting the same interpretation which is in his favour. In the the absence of any other evidence that credit was availed with malafide intention, invocation of longer limitation period was not justified

No comments:

Can GST Under RCM Not Charged and Paid from FY 2017-18 to October 2024 be Settled in FY 2024-25?

 In a recent and significant update to GST regulations, registered persons in India can now clear unpaid Reverse Charge Mechanism (RCM) liab...