CESTAT
disallows CENVAT credit of tax paid on outward freight not forming part of
‘assessable value’ of manufactured goods; According to CESTAT, accepting
assessee’s contention that value of service claimed as "input
service" is not includible in assessable value, would result in availment
of undue privilege of credit balance by paying lower tax and retention of tax
recovered from customer, which is clearly not intent of CENVAT Credit Rules
(CCR); CCR do not purport to be an exemption mechanism, but rather govern the
manner in which a fund of ‘non-money’ is acknowledged as means of discharging
tax/duty obligation and regulates its operation: Stating that, “foundation of
Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 is inherent relationship with tax liability for
without a tax liability on output goods or services, the Rules are merely
academic”, CESTAT holds that quantum of credit is linked to ingredients that
constitute value for tax liability; Rejects assessee’s reliance on various HC
rulings such as ABB Ltd. and Parth Poly Woven Pvt Ltd, stating that they do not
pertain to determination of dispute whether credit availed was in confirmity
with CENVAT Credit scheme, and on other hand, relies on decision of Maharashtra
Scooters Ltd. to conclude that tax paid on outward freight is unavailable to
offset duty liability on output goods : Mumbai CESTAT
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
CBDT issues second round of frequently asked questions in relation to Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024
This Tax Alert summarizes Circular No. 19/2024 dated 16 December 2024 (VSV 2- December Circular) issued by the Central Board of Direct Tax...
-
PCIT vs. The Executor of Estate of Late Smt. Manjula A. Shah (Bombay High Court) S. 50C Capital Gains: The valuation of the stamp autho...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Supreme Court (SC) [1] on availability of CENVAT Credit on mobile towers and pre-fabrica...
-
IFRS and US GAAP - Similarities and Differences What is IFRS? And what is GAAP? The main difference between IFRS and US GAAP is that G...
-
Madras HC reverses ITAT's order, grants deduction u/s. 80P(2)(a)(i) to assessee (a society engaged in the business of banking and provi...
-
SC dismisses assessee-company’s SLP challenging Bombay HC order upholding re-assessment initiation (beyond 4 yrs period) based on a special...
-
SC dismisses Revenue’s SLP challenging Bombay HC order in case of assessee (belonging to Lodha group of companies engaged in real estate bu...
-
Claiming a foreign tax credit (FTC) in Australia allows companies to offset foreign taxes paid on income earned overseas against their Aust...
-
HC allows HDFC Bank’s writ petition, quashes AO’s order and subsequent reference to TPO alleging that certain related party transactions [p...
-
Delhi ITAT deletes Rs. 1558.57 cr. capital gains addition on Telenor India for AY 2014-15, holds that set off of non-refundable entry fee p...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Bombay High Court (HC)1 on admissibility of input tax credit (ITC) w.r.t GST on advance p...
No comments:
Post a Comment