CBEC
issues clarification on issues related to furnishing of Bond/Letter of
Undertaking (LUT) for exports pursuant to communications received from field
formations and exporters regarding interpretation of Notification and Circular
dated July 7, 2017 and Circular dated July 5, 2017; Clarifies that, only such
exporter who has received a remittance of Rs. 1 crore or 10% of export
turnover, whichever is higher, in previous financial year (FY) is eligible for
LUT facility, however, such condition is inapplicable to a status holder
specified in paragraphs 3.20 and 3.21 of Foreign Trade Policy 2015-2020; Bonds
shall be furnished on non-judicial stamp paper, while LUTs can be submitted on
letterhead containing signature and seal of person or authorized person, further,
LUT/bond being a priori requirement for export, including supplies to a SEZ
developer/SEZ unit, should be processed on top most priority and be accepted
within a period of 3 working days from date of submission along with complete
documents by exporter; CT-1 Form holds no relevance under GST since transaction
between manufacturer and merchant exporter is not exempted even on submission
of LUT/bond; Zero rating of exports, including supplies to SEZ, is
allowed only with respect to supply by actual exporter under LUT/bond or
payment of IGST, further, zero rating is inapplicable to EOU supplies as there
is no special dispensation for them; LUT acceptance instead of a bond for
supplies of goods to Nepal or Bhutan or SEZ developer or SEZ unit will be permissible
irrespective of whether payments is received in Indian currency or convertible
foreign exchange as long as same is in accordance with RBI guidelines, however,
supply of services to Nepal or Bhutan shall be deemed to be export of services
only if payment is received in convertible foreign exchange; Further, exporter
is at liberty to furnish bond/LUT before Central Tax Authority or State Tax
Authority till administrative mechanism for assigning taxpayers to respective
authority is implemented; Unless there is any evidence to the contrary,
documents submitted as proof of fulfilling LUT conditions shall be accepted and
self-declaration shall be accepted unless there is specific information
otherwise; Reiterates that instructions issued vide circular dated July
7 and this circular shall apply to all exports made on or after July 1,
2017: CBEC Circular
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
CBDT issues second round of frequently asked questions in relation to Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024
This Tax Alert summarizes Circular No. 19/2024 dated 16 December 2024 (VSV 2- December Circular) issued by the Central Board of Direct Tax...
-
PCIT vs. The Executor of Estate of Late Smt. Manjula A. Shah (Bombay High Court) S. 50C Capital Gains: The valuation of the stamp autho...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Supreme Court (SC) [1] on availability of CENVAT Credit on mobile towers and pre-fabrica...
-
IFRS and US GAAP - Similarities and Differences What is IFRS? And what is GAAP? The main difference between IFRS and US GAAP is that G...
-
Madras HC reverses ITAT's order, grants deduction u/s. 80P(2)(a)(i) to assessee (a society engaged in the business of banking and provi...
-
SC dismisses assessee-company’s SLP challenging Bombay HC order upholding re-assessment initiation (beyond 4 yrs period) based on a special...
-
SC dismisses Revenue’s SLP challenging Bombay HC order in case of assessee (belonging to Lodha group of companies engaged in real estate bu...
-
Claiming a foreign tax credit (FTC) in Australia allows companies to offset foreign taxes paid on income earned overseas against their Aust...
-
HC allows HDFC Bank’s writ petition, quashes AO’s order and subsequent reference to TPO alleging that certain related party transactions [p...
-
Delhi ITAT deletes Rs. 1558.57 cr. capital gains addition on Telenor India for AY 2014-15, holds that set off of non-refundable entry fee p...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Bombay High Court (HC)1 on admissibility of input tax credit (ITC) w.r.t GST on advance p...
No comments:
Post a Comment