Delhi ITAT holds that
payment made by assessee company to individuals (resident of Germany and
Switzerland) for AY 2008-09 and 2009-10 cannot be taxed as
'fees for technical services' under Article 12 of India Germany and India
Switzerland DTAA, TDS u/s 195 inapplicable; Perusing the evidence in the form
of copies of trials conducted by NR, email exchanges and working protocol, ITAT
holds that services rendered were 'independent scientific services' falling
under Article 14 - 'independent personal services', but same cannot be brought
to tax in India absent a fixed base in India or non-resident
recipients staying in India for 120 days or more; Rejects Revenue's
contention that services would fall under Article 12, holds that Article 14
being a more specific provision applicable to professional services provided by
individuals, it would prevail over general provisions under Article 12 which
applies to all types of taxpayers; Also rejects Revenue's reliance on earlier
year ruling in assessee's own case where applicability of Article 14 was
rejected as assessee failed to prove that services were independent scientific
services, notes that in the year under consideration, assessee had provided
enough evidence to prove the nature of services provided by non-resident
individuals:ITAT
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
CBDT issues second round of frequently asked questions in relation to Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024
This Tax Alert summarizes Circular No. 19/2024 dated 16 December 2024 (VSV 2- December Circular) issued by the Central Board of Direct Tax...
-
PCIT vs. The Executor of Estate of Late Smt. Manjula A. Shah (Bombay High Court) S. 50C Capital Gains: The valuation of the stamp autho...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Supreme Court (SC) [1] on availability of CENVAT Credit on mobile towers and pre-fabrica...
-
IFRS and US GAAP - Similarities and Differences What is IFRS? And what is GAAP? The main difference between IFRS and US GAAP is that G...
-
Madras HC reverses ITAT's order, grants deduction u/s. 80P(2)(a)(i) to assessee (a society engaged in the business of banking and provi...
-
SC dismisses assessee-company’s SLP challenging Bombay HC order upholding re-assessment initiation (beyond 4 yrs period) based on a special...
-
SC dismisses Revenue’s SLP challenging Bombay HC order in case of assessee (belonging to Lodha group of companies engaged in real estate bu...
-
Claiming a foreign tax credit (FTC) in Australia allows companies to offset foreign taxes paid on income earned overseas against their Aust...
-
HC allows HDFC Bank’s writ petition, quashes AO’s order and subsequent reference to TPO alleging that certain related party transactions [p...
-
Delhi ITAT deletes Rs. 1558.57 cr. capital gains addition on Telenor India for AY 2014-15, holds that set off of non-refundable entry fee p...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Bombay High Court (HC)1 on admissibility of input tax credit (ITC) w.r.t GST on advance p...
No comments:
Post a Comment