Delhi ITAT grants deduction
for provision in respect of price reduction on set top boxes for subject AY
2007-08, notes that price reduction was crystallized after March 31st of
relevant year but before the finalization of financial statements; During
relevant AY, assessee company had sold set top boxes to Tata Sky Ltd. at the
price agreed as per the MOU dated January, 2006, however, owing to reduction in
duties announced by Union Budget w.e.f. March 1, 2007, there was a retrospective
reduction in the price as agreed between the parties vide letter dated August,
2007; Rejects Revenue’s stand that post facto adjustment to sales receipt
cannot be accepted since price reduction was crystallized after the closure of
the relevant year; ITAT observes that the provision for price reduction
pertained to the set top boxes sold during relevant year, notes that though the
exact price reduction happened post 31st March, 2007, it was in principle
agreed before March 31st (i.e. at the time of Union budget); Further in view of
AS-4 and mercantile system of accounting followed by assessee, ITAT holds that
costs directly associated with the revenue recognized during the relevant
period, irrespective of whether the money paid or not, have to be considered,
lastly clarifies that if the deduction is not allowed in subject AY, the same
has to be allowed in subsequent AY:ITAT
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
CBDT issues second round of frequently asked questions in relation to Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024
This Tax Alert summarizes Circular No. 19/2024 dated 16 December 2024 (VSV 2- December Circular) issued by the Central Board of Direct Tax...
-
PCIT vs. The Executor of Estate of Late Smt. Manjula A. Shah (Bombay High Court) S. 50C Capital Gains: The valuation of the stamp autho...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Supreme Court (SC) [1] on availability of CENVAT Credit on mobile towers and pre-fabrica...
-
IFRS and US GAAP - Similarities and Differences What is IFRS? And what is GAAP? The main difference between IFRS and US GAAP is that G...
-
Madras HC reverses ITAT's order, grants deduction u/s. 80P(2)(a)(i) to assessee (a society engaged in the business of banking and provi...
-
SC dismisses assessee-company’s SLP challenging Bombay HC order upholding re-assessment initiation (beyond 4 yrs period) based on a special...
-
SC dismisses Revenue’s SLP challenging Bombay HC order in case of assessee (belonging to Lodha group of companies engaged in real estate bu...
-
Claiming a foreign tax credit (FTC) in Australia allows companies to offset foreign taxes paid on income earned overseas against their Aust...
-
HC allows HDFC Bank’s writ petition, quashes AO’s order and subsequent reference to TPO alleging that certain related party transactions [p...
-
Delhi ITAT deletes Rs. 1558.57 cr. capital gains addition on Telenor India for AY 2014-15, holds that set off of non-refundable entry fee p...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Bombay High Court (HC)1 on admissibility of input tax credit (ITC) w.r.t GST on advance p...
No comments:
Post a Comment