Tuesday, 17 April 2012

CIT vs. Hariprasad Bhojnagarwala (Gujarat High Court – Full Bench)

S. 23(2): A HUF is “owner occupying house for own residence”

The assessee, a Hindu Undivided Family (HUF), claimed deduction u/s 23(2). The AO & CIT (A) took the view the view that as s. 23(2) applied to “a house or part of a house in the occupation of the owner for the purposes of his own residence“, a HUF was not eligible. The Tribunal took a contrary view and allowed the assessee’s claim. In view of the apparent conflict amongst various High Courts, the matter was referred to a Full Bench:

No comments:

Supreme Court ruling holds non-compete fee is allowable as revenue expenditure

  The Hon’ble Supreme Court settled the long-standing controversy surrounding the tax treatment of non-compete fees and, based on the facts ...