Monday, 4 May 2015

Nearly superprofits/ losses cannot be criterion for rejecting a comparable; circumstances for using multiple year data explained


 

Recently, the Delhi High Court in its verdict in the case of Chryscapital Investment Advisors (India) Private Limited emphasised functional analysis as the key comparability criteria, and inter-alia held that:
  • merely earning high profits/ losses could not be a reason to exclude a company as a comparable; and
  • for the purpose of comparability analysis, data of multiple years could be used only when such data has an influence on the transfer price of the transaction under consideration.

No comments:

GAAR Not Applicable to Genuine Capital Market Transactions: Telangana High Court

In a significant ruling, the Telangana High Court held that General Anti-Avoidance Rules (GAAR) cannot be invoked merely because a transacti...