Allahabad HC upholds ITAT
order for AY 2001-02, denies Sec. 80-IB deduction to assessee-company’s
(running a flour mill) on profits of industrial unit formed by takeover of
entire business from another entity; Holds that the industrial unit was set up
by purchase of used plant and machinery thus, resulting in violation of
condition u/s 80IB(2)(ii), observes that the purpose of Sec. 80-IB is to
promote setting up of a new industrial undertaking by purchasing new plant and
machinery which stands defeated in assessee's case; Relies on Madras HC
ruling in Heartland KG Information Limited rendered in context of Sec. 10A(2),
observes that Sec. 80IB(2)(ii) is pari materia with Sec.
10A(2)(iii); Clarifies that transfer of used plant and machinery to a new
undertaking and the formation of an industrial undertaking by splitting up/
reconstruction of existing business are two separate conditions u/s 80IB(2),
distinguishes assessee's reliance on Bombay HC ruling in Sonata Software
Limited in the context of splitting up/reconstruction; Remarks
that “The transfer of the used plant and machinery may not result in
splitting and reconstruction of the existing industrial undertaking but
nevertheless when an unit as a whole is transferred, it includes the transfer
of plant and machinery which was in use by the existing unit of a separate
legal entity for the formation of a separate industrial undertaking. This kind
of transfer is clearly hit by clause (iii) of Sec. 10A(2)..”:HC
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Bombay High Court Clarifies Tax Exemption Eligibility for Venture Capital Funds
In a significant ruling, the Bombay High Court has reaffirmed that a Venture Capital Fund (VCF) registered with SEBI is entitled to claim ...
-
Slump sale is transfer of one or more business undertakings for a lump sum consideration, without assigning individual values to the each...
-
A new website launched for TDS related matters www.tdscpc.gov.in TRACES – T DS R econciliation A nalysis and C orrection E nabling S yste...
-
Facts Centrica India Offshore Private Limited (CIO), an Indian Company, is a wholly owned subsidiary of Centrica Plc, UK Centrica Plc a...
-
The Tax Audit season has started and it’s the time when the Assessees rush to their Chartered Accountants (CA) to get their Tax Audit d...
-
SREI Infrastructure Finance Ltd vs. ITSC (Delhi High Court) The assessee entered into a scheme of arrangement u/s 391-394 of the Compani...
-
Facts The taxpayer, a partnership firm, derived income from the business of handling and transport of ship containers, customs clearing a...
-
M/s. Alpha Projects Society P. Ltd vs. DCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad) In AY 2005-06, the assessee made payments to contractors & for professi...
-
01. TDS u/s 194J is required to be done for Royalty also w.e.f 13-7-2006. 02. Royalty had been defined under explanation 2 of se...
-
F.No.354/66/2011-TRU Government of India Ministry of Finance Department of Revenue Central Board of Excise & Customs...
-
M/s. Merilyn Shipping & Transports vs. ACIT (ITAT Visakhapatnam Special Bench) The assessee incurred brokerage expenses of Rs.38....
No comments:
Post a Comment