Ahmedabad ITAT, in second
round of litigation, confirms unexplained cash credit addition u/s. 68 with
respect to share premium received by assessee (a private limited company
manufacturing PVC pipes) for AY 2002-03; ITAT observes that the taxpayer could not
produce even a single party out of the 13 share premium paying parties despite
they all being based locally, remarks that “the assessee has not made any
effort in discharging its initial onus so as to satisfy the basic factors of
identity, capacity, genuineness and creditworthiness of the 13 parties in
question who have paid it a very hefty share premium of Rs.90/- per share in
question.” ; Further, ITAT notes that assessee could not even submit any
original confirmation, holds that “its subsequent action in submitting all 4
photocopies of the same date indicates a very serious genuineness issue”;
Tribunal clarifies that mere filing of confirmation letter or by receiving
money through banking channel or by filing PAN particulars will not discharge
assessee’s onus; While acknowledging that there cannot be any 'straight jacket
formula' to determine share premium, Tribunal however puts onus squarely on the
assessee for its failure to even prima facie demonstrate the intrinsic value of
shares to be at par with the the exorbitant premium received; Applies Apex
Court ratios in Sumati Dayal and Durgaprasad More, wherein the Courts advocated
judging of evidence by applying the test of "human
probabilities".:ITAT
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Bombay High Court Clarifies Tax Exemption Eligibility for Venture Capital Funds
In a significant ruling, the Bombay High Court has reaffirmed that a Venture Capital Fund (VCF) registered with SEBI is entitled to claim ...
-
Slump sale is transfer of one or more business undertakings for a lump sum consideration, without assigning individual values to the each...
-
A new website launched for TDS related matters www.tdscpc.gov.in TRACES – T DS R econciliation A nalysis and C orrection E nabling S yste...
-
Facts Centrica India Offshore Private Limited (CIO), an Indian Company, is a wholly owned subsidiary of Centrica Plc, UK Centrica Plc a...
-
The Tax Audit season has started and it’s the time when the Assessees rush to their Chartered Accountants (CA) to get their Tax Audit d...
-
SREI Infrastructure Finance Ltd vs. ITSC (Delhi High Court) The assessee entered into a scheme of arrangement u/s 391-394 of the Compani...
-
Facts The taxpayer, a partnership firm, derived income from the business of handling and transport of ship containers, customs clearing a...
-
M/s. Alpha Projects Society P. Ltd vs. DCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad) In AY 2005-06, the assessee made payments to contractors & for professi...
-
01. TDS u/s 194J is required to be done for Royalty also w.e.f 13-7-2006. 02. Royalty had been defined under explanation 2 of se...
-
F.No.354/66/2011-TRU Government of India Ministry of Finance Department of Revenue Central Board of Excise & Customs...
-
M/s. Merilyn Shipping & Transports vs. ACIT (ITAT Visakhapatnam Special Bench) The assessee incurred brokerage expenses of Rs.38....
No comments:
Post a Comment