HC sets aside Single Judge
Bench order, finds direction to release detained goods on payment of 50% of
demand and execution of simple bond contrary to provisions of Section 129 of
Central GST Act / Kerala GST Ordinance r/w Rule 140 of CGST Rules; Notes that
goods were detained by Revenue on ground that documents accompanying them had
no nexus with actual goods under transport; Observes that Section 129 provides
for detention, seizure and release of goods and conveyances in transit, whereby
goods may be released provisionally upon execution of bond and furnishing of
security in prescribed manner or on payment of applicable tax, interest and
penalty in terms of Section 67(6); Hence, when statute itself provides a
mechanism for adjudication following detention of goods including provisional
release thereof, a deviation therefrom cannot be ordered, holds HC; However,
taking note of Rule 140 obliging dealer to produce goods upon demand, and
considering the inconvenience and prejudice likely to be caused on account of
delay, HC emphasizes the necessity of an expeditious adjudication even in cases
where goods are released provisionally : Kerala HC
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Bombay High Court Clarifies Tax Exemption Eligibility for Venture Capital Funds
In a significant ruling, the Bombay High Court has reaffirmed that a Venture Capital Fund (VCF) registered with SEBI is entitled to claim ...
-
Slump sale is transfer of one or more business undertakings for a lump sum consideration, without assigning individual values to the each...
-
A new website launched for TDS related matters www.tdscpc.gov.in TRACES – T DS R econciliation A nalysis and C orrection E nabling S yste...
-
Facts Centrica India Offshore Private Limited (CIO), an Indian Company, is a wholly owned subsidiary of Centrica Plc, UK Centrica Plc a...
-
The Tax Audit season has started and it’s the time when the Assessees rush to their Chartered Accountants (CA) to get their Tax Audit d...
-
SREI Infrastructure Finance Ltd vs. ITSC (Delhi High Court) The assessee entered into a scheme of arrangement u/s 391-394 of the Compani...
-
Facts The taxpayer, a partnership firm, derived income from the business of handling and transport of ship containers, customs clearing a...
-
M/s. Alpha Projects Society P. Ltd vs. DCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad) In AY 2005-06, the assessee made payments to contractors & for professi...
-
01. TDS u/s 194J is required to be done for Royalty also w.e.f 13-7-2006. 02. Royalty had been defined under explanation 2 of se...
-
F.No.354/66/2011-TRU Government of India Ministry of Finance Department of Revenue Central Board of Excise & Customs...
-
M/s. Merilyn Shipping & Transports vs. ACIT (ITAT Visakhapatnam Special Bench) The assessee incurred brokerage expenses of Rs.38....
No comments:
Post a Comment