HC quashes seizure order /
show cause notice passed / issued u/s 129 of CGST Act for non-filing of Part-B
of e-Way Bill during movement of goods within State of U.P up to transporter’s
premises; Accepts assessee’s contention that in terms of amendment to Rule 138
of CGST Rules vide Notification No. 12/2018-Central Tax, it was not obliged to
fill details of conveyance in Part-B where goods were being transported up to a
distance of 50 kms within the State, from the place of consignor’s business to
the place of transporter for further transportation; Finds force in assessee’s
submission that there was no intention to evade payment of tax for the reason that
it had charged IGST @ 18% in respect of such goods consigned to Gujarat; Noting
that all the documents accompanied the goods and requisite details were duly
mentioned, HC elucidates that mere non-mentioning of vehicle no. in Part-B
cannot be a ground for seizure of goods; Moreover, states that it was
obligatory on Revenue’s part to pass an appropriate reasoned order on noting
that no reasons were assigned nor any discussion mentioned therein,
consequently directs release of seized goods & vehicle: Allahabad HC
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Bombay High Court Clarifies Tax Exemption Eligibility for Venture Capital Funds
In a significant ruling, the Bombay High Court has reaffirmed that a Venture Capital Fund (VCF) registered with SEBI is entitled to claim ...
-
Slump sale is transfer of one or more business undertakings for a lump sum consideration, without assigning individual values to the each...
-
A new website launched for TDS related matters www.tdscpc.gov.in TRACES – T DS R econciliation A nalysis and C orrection E nabling S yste...
-
Facts Centrica India Offshore Private Limited (CIO), an Indian Company, is a wholly owned subsidiary of Centrica Plc, UK Centrica Plc a...
-
The Tax Audit season has started and it’s the time when the Assessees rush to their Chartered Accountants (CA) to get their Tax Audit d...
-
SREI Infrastructure Finance Ltd vs. ITSC (Delhi High Court) The assessee entered into a scheme of arrangement u/s 391-394 of the Compani...
-
Facts The taxpayer, a partnership firm, derived income from the business of handling and transport of ship containers, customs clearing a...
-
M/s. Alpha Projects Society P. Ltd vs. DCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad) In AY 2005-06, the assessee made payments to contractors & for professi...
-
01. TDS u/s 194J is required to be done for Royalty also w.e.f 13-7-2006. 02. Royalty had been defined under explanation 2 of se...
-
F.No.354/66/2011-TRU Government of India Ministry of Finance Department of Revenue Central Board of Excise & Customs...
-
M/s. Merilyn Shipping & Transports vs. ACIT (ITAT Visakhapatnam Special Bench) The assessee incurred brokerage expenses of Rs.38....
No comments:
Post a Comment