AAR rules that the
‘front-end fee’ payable by a customer in India, for appraisal of loan
application carried outside India, under the financing arrangement with the
Applicant (a France based Financial Institution), not ‘interest’ under Article
12 of India-France DTAA, follows Bombay HC ruling in Commonwealth Development
Corporation; Notes that in order to constitute interest under India-France
DTAA, the income must be from debt claims, observes that there was no debt
claim in existence when the ‘front-end fee’ for loan application appraisal was
payable, further notes that the payment was fixed and mandatory and neither
dependent upon nor connected with the loans advanced; Also holds payment was
not taxable as FTS under Article 13 of DTAA, absent ‘make available’ of
technical knowledge, experience, skill, know-how or processes to the borrower,
follows Delhi HC ruling in Steria (India) Limited for reading the restricted
scope of FTS into the India-France DTAA, however, holds that the fees shall be
taxable as business income if PE for applicant exists in India; With respect to
front end fees other than appraisal fee, AAR notes that those are charged only
in respect of a successful loan approval at a certain percentage of the
proposed investment, and thus have a direct nexus with the debt claim;
Likewise AAR holds that the commitment fee, cancellation fee, amendment fee and
monitoring fee are directly related to debt claim as the fees are charged after
disbursement of loan, accordingly upholds taxability as ‘interest’ on these
payments under DTAA:AAR
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Bombay High Court Clarifies Tax Exemption Eligibility for Venture Capital Funds
In a significant ruling, the Bombay High Court has reaffirmed that a Venture Capital Fund (VCF) registered with SEBI is entitled to claim ...
-
Slump sale is transfer of one or more business undertakings for a lump sum consideration, without assigning individual values to the each...
-
A new website launched for TDS related matters www.tdscpc.gov.in TRACES – T DS R econciliation A nalysis and C orrection E nabling S yste...
-
Facts Centrica India Offshore Private Limited (CIO), an Indian Company, is a wholly owned subsidiary of Centrica Plc, UK Centrica Plc a...
-
The Tax Audit season has started and it’s the time when the Assessees rush to their Chartered Accountants (CA) to get their Tax Audit d...
-
SREI Infrastructure Finance Ltd vs. ITSC (Delhi High Court) The assessee entered into a scheme of arrangement u/s 391-394 of the Compani...
-
Facts The taxpayer, a partnership firm, derived income from the business of handling and transport of ship containers, customs clearing a...
-
M/s. Alpha Projects Society P. Ltd vs. DCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad) In AY 2005-06, the assessee made payments to contractors & for professi...
-
01. TDS u/s 194J is required to be done for Royalty also w.e.f 13-7-2006. 02. Royalty had been defined under explanation 2 of se...
-
F.No.354/66/2011-TRU Government of India Ministry of Finance Department of Revenue Central Board of Excise & Customs...
-
M/s. Merilyn Shipping & Transports vs. ACIT (ITAT Visakhapatnam Special Bench) The assessee incurred brokerage expenses of Rs.38....
No comments:
Post a Comment