Pune
ITAT accepts assessee’s (land owner) plea that advance received from
developer towards flat booking shall not be taxable in subject AY 2009-10 on
receipt basis, but in subsequent AY when the project was completed and
tenements / flats were handed over to the prospective buyers; Notes that the
assessee had given the land for development and was entitled to receive 18% on
gross sales under the terms of development agreement (‘DA’); With
respect to advance booking amount received in subject AY, ITAT remarks
that “The said amount received by the assessee is an advance receipt
because the right to collect the said amount would crystallize on the day when
the tenants or portion of land is sold by the developer to the prospective
buyers.”; Moreover, observes that the developer recognized the completion
and sale of developed portion in subsequent AY 2011-12, consequently, holds
that the business profits arising to assessee were taxable in such year;
Lastly, ITAT clarifies that since the amount is not assessable to tax as his
business profits in subject AY, the capital gains arising on conversion of
capital asset into stock-in-trade is also not to be taxed in the hands of
assessee in subject AY but in the year in which the business profits are to be
taxed:ITAT
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Bombay High Court Clarifies Tax Exemption Eligibility for Venture Capital Funds
In a significant ruling, the Bombay High Court has reaffirmed that a Venture Capital Fund (VCF) registered with SEBI is entitled to claim ...
-
Slump sale is transfer of one or more business undertakings for a lump sum consideration, without assigning individual values to the each...
-
A new website launched for TDS related matters www.tdscpc.gov.in TRACES – T DS R econciliation A nalysis and C orrection E nabling S yste...
-
Facts Centrica India Offshore Private Limited (CIO), an Indian Company, is a wholly owned subsidiary of Centrica Plc, UK Centrica Plc a...
-
The Tax Audit season has started and it’s the time when the Assessees rush to their Chartered Accountants (CA) to get their Tax Audit d...
-
SREI Infrastructure Finance Ltd vs. ITSC (Delhi High Court) The assessee entered into a scheme of arrangement u/s 391-394 of the Compani...
-
Facts The taxpayer, a partnership firm, derived income from the business of handling and transport of ship containers, customs clearing a...
-
M/s. Alpha Projects Society P. Ltd vs. DCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad) In AY 2005-06, the assessee made payments to contractors & for professi...
-
01. TDS u/s 194J is required to be done for Royalty also w.e.f 13-7-2006. 02. Royalty had been defined under explanation 2 of se...
-
F.No.354/66/2011-TRU Government of India Ministry of Finance Department of Revenue Central Board of Excise & Customs...
-
M/s. Merilyn Shipping & Transports vs. ACIT (ITAT Visakhapatnam Special Bench) The assessee incurred brokerage expenses of Rs.38....
No comments:
Post a Comment