· Supreme court further dismiss SLP against decision of Calcutta High court given to Suncraft Energy which quashed demand of ITC against service recipient for mismatch in GSTR 2A and GSTR 3B in the absence of any investigation done at the end of supplier.
· Kerala
High court in the case of Josco Bullion held that when the issue before the
Central GST and the State GST were not one and same. Therefore, the bar thus
created under Section 6 will not come into play & hence state GST can open
the matter which was not considered by central government.
·
Karnataka HC in the case of United Breweries grants
ad-interim stay in a writ challenging show cause notice seeking to levy GST on salary and other costs
incurred by Head Office (HO) alleging that such costs incurred at HO amount to
a service being provided to Branch Offices (Bos).
·
Delhi HC holds Tax Research Unit of the Department of Revenue
lacks authority to issue GST circulars.
·
Chennai High court in the case of
Caterpillar India held that recovery can’t be made directly due to difference in GSTR-1
& GSTR-3B without following the procedure under Rule 88C of the CGST Rules,
2017.
·
Madras High Court in the case of Lenovo
India held that time limit of 2 years for filing refund claims under section 54(1) is to
be considered directory and not mandatory. The judgment emphasizes the crucial
distinction between the use of the terms "may" and "shall"
in Section 54(1), indicating a discretionary rather than obligatory nature.
· Bombay
HC in the case of Star engineers
directed GST authorities to permit petitioner to rectify Form
GSTR-1 either through online or manual mode for F.Y 2021-22.
· Telengana
AAR in the case of Geekay wires Ltd held that ITC required to be reversed on
inputs/finished goods lost in fire accident, steel scrap sold in open market.
No comments:
Post a Comment