This Tax Alert summarizes a recent judgement of the Karnataka High Court (HC). The issue relates to applicability of service tax on recovery of various expenses by Venture Capital Fund (VCF) from the contributors.
Earlier, Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) Bangalore upheld levy of service tax on such recovery under the head ‘banking
and other financial services’ (BOFS) defined u/s 65 (105)(zm) of Finance Act,
1994 (Finance Act). Aggrieved, the taxpayer filed an appeal
before the HC.
The key observations of HC are:
- The
definition clauses of each statute must be read with the object and
purpose of that statute only as intended by the legislature. Various
statutes such as SEBI, GST, IBC recognize ‘trust’ as a person whereas the
Finance Act does not.
Hence, CESTAT has erred in holding the petitioner to be a juridical person. - The
petitioner acts as a ‘pass through’, wherein funds from contributors are
consolidated and invested by the investment manager.
- The
contributors and the trust cannot be dissected as two different entities
because, it is an admitted fact that contributors investment is held in
trust by the fund and it is invested as per the advice of investment
manager.
- Therefore,
the doctrine of mutuality must apply in the instant case and there can be
no service to self.
Basis above, HC quashed service tax liability on
expense recovered by VCF.
Comments:
- This
ruling provides much need relief and clarity to the financial services
sector.
- While
the ruling deals with the matter in case of Venture Capital Fund, it is
likely to impact other similar investment pooling vehicle structures, both
onshore and offshore.
- Basis
the change in the provisions under GST, the applicability of this ruling
may need to be analysed.
No comments:
Post a Comment