Monday, 17 September 2012

S. 147: Reversal of law by Supreme Court does not justify reopening

When the assessment order was passed, the law as declared by the jurisdictional High Court was that the civil construction work carried out by the assessee would be entitled to the benefit of s. 80HH. This was reversed in CIT vs. N.C. Budharaja 204 ITR 412 (SC). The subsequent reversal of the legal position by the judgment of the Supreme Court does not authorise the Department to reopen the assessment, which stood closed on the basis of the law, as it stood at the relevant time

 DCIT vs. Simplex Concrete Piles (India) Ltd (Supreme Court)

No comments:

Section 56(2)(ix): Forfeiture of Advance Money Received – A Critical Analysis

The Dual Conditions for Taxability Section 56(2)(ix) of the Income Tax Act imposes tax liability on sums received as advance or otherwise du...