Thursday 20 September 2012

Transfer of PANs Of Non-Resident Assessees

LETTER [F.NO. ADDL. DIT/INTL. TAXATION/2012-13], DATED 19-9-2012
Jurisdiction over non-resident assessee lies with the AOs under administrative control of DGIT (Intl. Tax). It has been observed by DGIT (Intl. Tax.) that PAN of many non-resident assessees are lying with the AOs who do not have jurisdiction over them.
2. PAN not lying in correct jurisdiction poses many operational and administrative difficulties, e.g. in some cases where AAR report is required to be sent and if, PAN is not in correct jurisdiction, the situation often leads on to incorrect and erroneous report. Similarly AO cannot view the e-filed returns of an assessee if
the PAN is not with them. As a result they cannot examine their returns for selection of scrutiny, survey, TDS monitoring, grievances handling etc.
3. Accordingly, a list of all such PANs where the return of income was e-filed for AY 2011-12 and lying with AOs who do not have jurisdiction over non-resident assessee has been obtained from O/o DGIT System. The total of such PANs are 64697. RCC wise breakup of such PANs is attached as per Annexure – A and ‘RCC wise and Formwise breakup’ is attached as per Annexure – B.
4. The breakup of these PANs as per return form filled is as under:
DISTRIBUTION OF PAN AS PER FORMS OF RETURNS OF INCOME
FORM_NAME
Total of PAN
ITR-1
30042
ITR-2
23876
ITR-3
1944
ITR-4
5670
ITR-4S
674
ITR-5
965
ITR-6
1391
Total
64697

5. I am directed by Hon’ble Chairman, CBDT to inform all concerned CCsIT/DGsIT regarding the pendency of such PANs in their charge and request them to transfer such PANs by 24.09.2012 afternoon or else automatic transfer will be resorted to in a week’s time.
6. Please take this matter on priority.
ANNEXURE - A
RCC wise breakup of PANs lying in domestic jurisdiction
S. No.
RCC
CCA
No. of PANs
1
 Agra
UP(W)
324
2
 Ahmedabad
Ahmedabad
2651
3
 Allahabad
UP(E)
217
4
 Amritsar
NWR
399
5
 Bangalore
Bangalore
6583
6
 Baroda
Ahmedabad
1469
7
Bhopal
Bhopal
1257
8
Bhubaneshwar
Bhubaneshwar
217
9
Chennai
Chennai
4132
10
Coimbotore
Chennai
602
11
 Delhi
Delhi
6977
12
 Hyderabad
Hyderabad
2781
13
 Jabalpur
Jabalpur
417
14
 Jaipur
Jaipur
1102
15
 Jalandhar
NWR
928
16
 Jodhpur
Jaipur
846
17
 Kanpur
Kanpur
206
18
 Kochi
Kochi
1482
19
 Kolhapur
Pune
191
20
 Kolkata
Kolkata
2299
21
 Lucknow
UP(E)
563
22
 Madurai
Chennai
389
23
 Meerut
UP(W)
1336
24
 Mumbai
Mumbai
14480
25
 Nagpur
Nagpur
471
26
 Nashik
Pune
357
27
 Patiala
NWR
1146
28
 Patna
Patna
236
29
 Pune
Pune
4647
30
 Rajkot
Ahmedabad
924
31
 Ranchi
Patna
391
32
 Rohtak
NWR
1769
33
 Shillong
NER
144
34
 Surat
Ahmedabad
1436
35
 Trivandrum
Kochi
785
36
 Vizag
Hyderabad
410
Total
64697

ANNEXURE - B
RCC wise and Form wise Breakup
RCC
Total Of ID
ITR-1
ITR-2
ITR-3
ITR-4
ITR-4S
ITR-5
ITR-6
AGR
 324
168
82
4
47
4
16
3
AHM
 2651
860
1191
128
329
30
83
30
ALD
 217
97
42
5
42
13
16
2
AMR
 399
200
90
18
49
11
28
3
BBN
217
136
52
2
23
2
1
1
BLR
6583
4116
1971
87
308
14
8
79
BOM
14480
5369
6655
545
1069
35
224
583
BPL
1257
581
399
33
176
25
27
16
BRD
1469
631
514
141
140
20
14
9
CAL
2299
960
999
51
171
45
38
35
CHN
1482
679
485
118
179
11
4
6
CMB
602
250
230
25
73
8
15
1
DEL
6977
3417
2495
127
545
73
60
260
HYD
2781
1485
1017
70
160
10
20
19
JBP
415
211
73
7
69
26
23
6
JDH
846
450
163
9
128
68
24
4
JLD
928
438
239
57
123
25
38
8
JPR
1102
607
256
49
125
25
17
23
KLP
191
73
58
6
32
11
8
3
KNP
206
124
50
1
22
3
1
5
LKN
563
298
155
9
72
10
17
2
MDS
4132
2044
1629
68
316
12
22
41
MRI
389
152
151
18
61
1
4
2
MRT
1336
866
317
14
97
20
16
6
NGP
471
192
145
7
90
16
16
5
NSK
357
120
154
3
41
8
10
21
PNE
4647
2039
1971
87
355
20
39
136
PTL
1146
653
319
23
100
20
23
8
PTN
236
108
85
5
29
2
5
2
RCH
391
235
114
5
30
6
1
RKT
924
211
425
90
124
19
44
11
RTK
1769
1098
398
19
139
34
33
48
SHL
144
70
32
2
24
5
4
7
SRT
1436
466
555
74
240
39
58
4
TVD
785
448
218
24
89
2
2
2
VPN
410
190
147
13
53
1
6

No comments:

Department of Commerce issues clarification on newly inserted Rule 11B of SEZ Rules

  This Tax Alert summarizes a recent instruction  issued by the SEZ Division, Department of Commerce, clarifying various concerns relating t...