The assessee purchased a residential flat from a NRI ("seller"). The AO noted that as per section 195, the assessee ought to have deducted tax on the sale consideration before making payment to the seller, however, assessee contended that he was liable to pay the tax on the basis of capital gains. Rejecting assessee's contentions, AO initiated proceedings under sec. 201(1), treating the assessee to be an assessee-in-default. The CIT (A) upheld the order of AO. On appeal, the Tribunal held in favour of revenue - It held that the section 195(1) required the assessee to deduct tax on entire sale consideration. If the assessee considered otherwise, section 195(2) required him to make an application to the AO to determine the appropriate proportion of consideration on which tax should be deducted, but the assessee failed to do so. Thus, the finding of AO that quantification of the TDS under sec. 195 ought to be made on the entire sale consideration was correct and it couldn't be made on the basis of capital gains. Therefore, it was held that AO had rightly raised demand under sec. 201 and issued notice of demand under sec. 156 - SYED ASLAM HASHMI v. ITO [2012] 26 taxmann.com 6 (Bangalore - Trib.) |
Thursday, 11 October 2012
Unless Sec. 195(2) clearance is obtained, tax has to be deducted from sales consideration and not just from capital gains
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
CBDT issues second round of frequently asked questions in relation to Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024
This Tax Alert summarizes Circular No. 19/2024 dated 16 December 2024 (VSV 2- December Circular) issued by the Central Board of Direct Tax...
-
PCIT vs. The Executor of Estate of Late Smt. Manjula A. Shah (Bombay High Court) S. 50C Capital Gains: The valuation of the stamp autho...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Supreme Court (SC) [1] on availability of CENVAT Credit on mobile towers and pre-fabrica...
-
IFRS and US GAAP - Similarities and Differences What is IFRS? And what is GAAP? The main difference between IFRS and US GAAP is that G...
-
Madras HC reverses ITAT's order, grants deduction u/s. 80P(2)(a)(i) to assessee (a society engaged in the business of banking and provi...
-
SC dismisses assessee-company’s SLP challenging Bombay HC order upholding re-assessment initiation (beyond 4 yrs period) based on a special...
-
SC dismisses Revenue’s SLP challenging Bombay HC order in case of assessee (belonging to Lodha group of companies engaged in real estate bu...
-
Claiming a foreign tax credit (FTC) in Australia allows companies to offset foreign taxes paid on income earned overseas against their Aust...
-
HC allows HDFC Bank’s writ petition, quashes AO’s order and subsequent reference to TPO alleging that certain related party transactions [p...
-
Delhi ITAT deletes Rs. 1558.57 cr. capital gains addition on Telenor India for AY 2014-15, holds that set off of non-refundable entry fee p...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Bombay High Court (HC)1 on admissibility of input tax credit (ITC) w.r.t GST on advance p...
No comments:
Post a Comment