This
tax alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Rajasthan High Court (HC), in the
case of Rajasthan Urban Infrastructure Development Project (Taxpayer), on the
question of whether tax is required to be withheld on service tax payable on
professional/technical fees payable to consultants.
Taking
note of the findings of lower authorities that the agreements between the
parties provided that service tax was payable by the Taxpayer in addition to
professional/technical fees, the HC held that tax was not required to be
withheld on the service tax component.
The
Central Board of Direct Taxes, in its Circulars, has taken a view that there is
a distinction between the scope of withholding on rent which refers to ‘any
income payable’ by way of rent and that of withholding on fees for
professional/technical services which refers to ‘any sum’ by way of
professional/technical services. Based on this distinction, it has taken a view
that withholding is not necessary on service tax on rent but the same logic will
not apply to service tax on professional/technical services.
However,
the present HC ruling provides guidance that, if indirect taxes are payable in
addition to professional/technical fees, as per the terms of the contract – an
aspect which needs to be factually established, then, withholding is not
required on the indirect tax component since the withholding obligation is only
in respect of the sum which relates to professional/ technical fees.
The
principle will also be useful for other withholding provisions of ITL where
similar language has been employed.
No comments:
Post a Comment