HC sets
aside CESTAT's order pertaining to deletion of penalty on assessee for
mis-declaration of goods, upholds penalty u/s 112 of the Customs Act, 1962
(Act), while setting aside penalty u/s 114A; Agreeing with CESTAT, sets aside
interest demand since show cause notice (SCN) does not mention about Section 28
of Customs Act, and also does not mention as to what provisions of law the
interest was sought to be recovered although order confirms interest u/s
Section 28AB Act; Further states that, even if it is considered that demand
arises out of finalization of provisional assessment u/s 18, it is settled by
judicial pronouncements that no interest is recoverable on finalization of
provisional assessments made prior to July 13, 2007; Opines that, penalty
u/s 114A is not leviable since SCN did not mention anything about Section 28
and wording of Section 114A makes it expressly clear that penalty under said
Section is attracted when liability to pay duty or interest is determined u/s
28; However, distinguishing case of Care Foundation and Amrit Foods from
present case, states in present case, SCN invokes both Section 114A and 112,
and given that, both penal provisions are invoked, question of deleting penalty
could not have arisen : Delhi HC
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Taxability of online games
Introduction: 1. Taxability of online winnings before the introduction of section 115BBJ of the Income Tax Act and section 194BA of the Inco...
-
A new website launched for TDS related matters www.tdscpc.gov.in TRACES – T DS R econciliation A nalysis and C orrection E nabling S yste...
-
This is to update you about an important decision by Tribunal in the case of Filatex India Limited vs. CCE & ST , E A No. 10231 of ...
-
LEASE-DEED (A brief Introduction) Lease defined. A lease of immovable property is a transfer of a right to enjoy such property, mad...
-
Introduction It's important for taxpayers to have a clear understanding of the available allowances and deductions, as they can grea...
-
· Mumbai ITAT in the case of Mukesh Harilal Mehta held that Exemption U/S 54 cannot be denied merely due to mistake by the developer.
-
We all are currently in the process of submitting Rectification Applications under Section 161 of GST Laws for errors that are evident fro...
-
Particulars in Part 1 and Part 2 of Step-2 of registration form are required to be exactly the same as reported in the TDS statement. Plea...
-
Earlier this year, the Mauritius Government approved the amendment to the India – Mauritius tax treaty, aligning it with the proposal of th...
-
Slump sale is transfer of one or more business undertakings for a lump sum consideration, without assigning individual values to the each...
-
The circular of the Board dt. 28.06.1965 No. 17 (XL-36), provides for inspection fees and fees for certified copies of assessment and...
No comments:
Post a Comment