HC sets
aside CESTAT's order pertaining to deletion of penalty on assessee for
mis-declaration of goods, upholds penalty u/s 112 of the Customs Act, 1962
(Act), while setting aside penalty u/s 114A; Agreeing with CESTAT, sets aside
interest demand since show cause notice (SCN) does not mention about Section 28
of Customs Act, and also does not mention as to what provisions of law the
interest was sought to be recovered although order confirms interest u/s
Section 28AB Act; Further states that, even if it is considered that demand
arises out of finalization of provisional assessment u/s 18, it is settled by
judicial pronouncements that no interest is recoverable on finalization of
provisional assessments made prior to July 13, 2007; Opines that, penalty
u/s 114A is not leviable since SCN did not mention anything about Section 28
and wording of Section 114A makes it expressly clear that penalty under said
Section is attracted when liability to pay duty or interest is determined u/s
28; However, distinguishing case of Care Foundation and Amrit Foods from
present case, states in present case, SCN invokes both Section 114A and 112,
and given that, both penal provisions are invoked, question of deleting penalty
could not have arisen : Delhi HC
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
CBDT issues second round of frequently asked questions in relation to Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024
This Tax Alert summarizes Circular No. 19/2024 dated 16 December 2024 (VSV 2- December Circular) issued by the Central Board of Direct Tax...
-
PCIT vs. The Executor of Estate of Late Smt. Manjula A. Shah (Bombay High Court) S. 50C Capital Gains: The valuation of the stamp autho...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Supreme Court (SC) [1] on availability of CENVAT Credit on mobile towers and pre-fabrica...
-
IFRS and US GAAP - Similarities and Differences What is IFRS? And what is GAAP? The main difference between IFRS and US GAAP is that G...
-
Madras HC reverses ITAT's order, grants deduction u/s. 80P(2)(a)(i) to assessee (a society engaged in the business of banking and provi...
-
SC dismisses assessee-company’s SLP challenging Bombay HC order upholding re-assessment initiation (beyond 4 yrs period) based on a special...
-
SC dismisses Revenue’s SLP challenging Bombay HC order in case of assessee (belonging to Lodha group of companies engaged in real estate bu...
-
Claiming a foreign tax credit (FTC) in Australia allows companies to offset foreign taxes paid on income earned overseas against their Aust...
-
HC allows HDFC Bank’s writ petition, quashes AO’s order and subsequent reference to TPO alleging that certain related party transactions [p...
-
Delhi ITAT deletes Rs. 1558.57 cr. capital gains addition on Telenor India for AY 2014-15, holds that set off of non-refundable entry fee p...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Bombay High Court (HC)1 on admissibility of input tax credit (ITC) w.r.t GST on advance p...
No comments:
Post a Comment