Mumbai ITAT rules that
consideration received by assessee-company (engaged in research development,
manufacturing, licensing of bio-pharmaceuticals products) on assignment
of indigenously developed patent of a medicine shall be taxable
as ‘capital gains’ and shall be subject to applicability of Sec. 55(2)
(which states that cost of acquisition for self-generated goodwill, right to
manufacture etc. shall be taken at ‘nil’) for AY 2008-09; Assessee had argued
that the amount was a non-taxable capital receipt, as no cost was incurred for
developing the patent and further even if cost was incurred, it was not
ascertainable, moreover transfer of know–how/patent was not covered by Sec.
55(2); ITAT notes that for developing a patent of medicine, assessee has
to carry out research analysis and experimentation, further notes that medical
patents require clinical tests and administering drugs to the patients, hence
the claim that no cost was incurred is not acceptable; ITAT holds that
assessee’s case falls under the ambit of ‘right to manufacture/produce/process
any article or thing’ as envisaged u/s 55(2)(a), distinguishes assessee’s
reliance on ITAT ruling in Kwality Biscuit (P.) Ltd. as it dealt with
trade-mark and brand name, similarly distinguishes assessee’s reliance on
Bombay HC ruling in Fernhill Laboratories and Industrial Establishment on
facts:ITAT
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Department of Commerce issues clarification on newly inserted Rule 11B of SEZ Rules
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent instruction issued by the SEZ Division, Department of Commerce, clarifying various concerns relating t...
-
A new website launched for TDS related matters www.tdscpc.gov.in TRACES – T DS R econciliation A nalysis and C orrection E nabling S yste...
-
LEASE-DEED (A brief Introduction) Lease defined. A lease of immovable property is a transfer of a right to enjoy such property, mad...
-
Introduction It's important for taxpayers to have a clear understanding of the available allowances and deductions, as they can grea...
-
· Mumbai ITAT in the case of Mukesh Harilal Mehta held that Exemption U/S 54 cannot be denied merely due to mistake by the developer.
-
Particulars in Part 1 and Part 2 of Step-2 of registration form are required to be exactly the same as reported in the TDS statement. Plea...
-
Earlier this year, the Mauritius Government approved the amendment to the India – Mauritius tax treaty, aligning it with the proposal of th...
-
Slump sale is transfer of one or more business undertakings for a lump sum consideration, without assigning individual values to the each...
-
An eminent concern within the GST framework pertains to the entitlement of Input Tax Credit (ITC) concerning expenditures associated with In...
-
Introduction The law relating to companies is laid down in Companies Act, 2013 and the rules made thereunder and t...
-
Facts · India company has overseas subsidiary companies and there may arise requirement wherein customer execution requires the inv...
No comments:
Post a Comment