Mumbai ITAT rules that
consideration received by assessee-company (engaged in research development,
manufacturing, licensing of bio-pharmaceuticals products) on assignment
of indigenously developed patent of a medicine shall be taxable
as ‘capital gains’ and shall be subject to applicability of Sec. 55(2)
(which states that cost of acquisition for self-generated goodwill, right to
manufacture etc. shall be taken at ‘nil’) for AY 2008-09; Assessee had argued
that the amount was a non-taxable capital receipt, as no cost was incurred for
developing the patent and further even if cost was incurred, it was not
ascertainable, moreover transfer of know–how/patent was not covered by Sec.
55(2); ITAT notes that for developing a patent of medicine, assessee has
to carry out research analysis and experimentation, further notes that medical
patents require clinical tests and administering drugs to the patients, hence
the claim that no cost was incurred is not acceptable; ITAT holds that
assessee’s case falls under the ambit of ‘right to manufacture/produce/process
any article or thing’ as envisaged u/s 55(2)(a), distinguishes assessee’s
reliance on ITAT ruling in Kwality Biscuit (P.) Ltd. as it dealt with
trade-mark and brand name, similarly distinguishes assessee’s reliance on
Bombay HC ruling in Fernhill Laboratories and Industrial Establishment on
facts:ITAT
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
CBDT issues second round of frequently asked questions in relation to Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024
This Tax Alert summarizes Circular No. 19/2024 dated 16 December 2024 (VSV 2- December Circular) issued by the Central Board of Direct Tax...
-
PCIT vs. The Executor of Estate of Late Smt. Manjula A. Shah (Bombay High Court) S. 50C Capital Gains: The valuation of the stamp autho...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Supreme Court (SC) [1] on availability of CENVAT Credit on mobile towers and pre-fabrica...
-
IFRS and US GAAP - Similarities and Differences What is IFRS? And what is GAAP? The main difference between IFRS and US GAAP is that G...
-
Madras HC reverses ITAT's order, grants deduction u/s. 80P(2)(a)(i) to assessee (a society engaged in the business of banking and provi...
-
SC dismisses assessee-company’s SLP challenging Bombay HC order upholding re-assessment initiation (beyond 4 yrs period) based on a special...
-
SC dismisses Revenue’s SLP challenging Bombay HC order in case of assessee (belonging to Lodha group of companies engaged in real estate bu...
-
Claiming a foreign tax credit (FTC) in Australia allows companies to offset foreign taxes paid on income earned overseas against their Aust...
-
HC allows HDFC Bank’s writ petition, quashes AO’s order and subsequent reference to TPO alleging that certain related party transactions [p...
-
Delhi ITAT deletes Rs. 1558.57 cr. capital gains addition on Telenor India for AY 2014-15, holds that set off of non-refundable entry fee p...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Bombay High Court (HC)1 on admissibility of input tax credit (ITC) w.r.t GST on advance p...
No comments:
Post a Comment