HC
exercises writ jurisdiction to set aside adjudication order confirming excise
duty liability on activity of supply of IT products purchased from vendors and
installation at customers’ premises after customization as per their needs;
Notes assessee’s claim that integrating multiple products sourced from
different vendors only involved a skill of service and nothing else,
accordingly it had paid service tax thereon; Seeking to set right the
jurisdictional error committed in decision making process, HC observes that
each of assessee’s activities would require to be examined on focal point
whether they would fall within the meaning of manufacture of goods or not;
There cannot be generalization of assessee’s activities, states HC while
observing, “No doubt, the law discussed by the Commissioner is the correct
principles revolving around the issue. But, the point is whether each of the
activities of the petitioner would fall for consideration as a 'manufacturer of
goods' or not.” ; Accordingly, remands the matter for fresh consideration,
without expressing any view on merits : Kerala HC
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
CBDT issues second round of frequently asked questions in relation to Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024
This Tax Alert summarizes Circular No. 19/2024 dated 16 December 2024 (VSV 2- December Circular) issued by the Central Board of Direct Tax...
-
PCIT vs. The Executor of Estate of Late Smt. Manjula A. Shah (Bombay High Court) S. 50C Capital Gains: The valuation of the stamp autho...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Supreme Court (SC) [1] on availability of CENVAT Credit on mobile towers and pre-fabrica...
-
IFRS and US GAAP - Similarities and Differences What is IFRS? And what is GAAP? The main difference between IFRS and US GAAP is that G...
-
Madras HC reverses ITAT's order, grants deduction u/s. 80P(2)(a)(i) to assessee (a society engaged in the business of banking and provi...
-
SC dismisses assessee-company’s SLP challenging Bombay HC order upholding re-assessment initiation (beyond 4 yrs period) based on a special...
-
SC dismisses Revenue’s SLP challenging Bombay HC order in case of assessee (belonging to Lodha group of companies engaged in real estate bu...
-
Claiming a foreign tax credit (FTC) in Australia allows companies to offset foreign taxes paid on income earned overseas against their Aust...
-
HC allows HDFC Bank’s writ petition, quashes AO’s order and subsequent reference to TPO alleging that certain related party transactions [p...
-
Delhi ITAT deletes Rs. 1558.57 cr. capital gains addition on Telenor India for AY 2014-15, holds that set off of non-refundable entry fee p...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Bombay High Court (HC)1 on admissibility of input tax credit (ITC) w.r.t GST on advance p...
No comments:
Post a Comment