OECD's Tax Challenges
Arising from Digitalisation – Interim Report 2018 (the Interim
Report) released a few minutes ago acknowledges 'divergent views' on
taxation approach and highlights that countries will work towards a
consensus-based solution; The Interim Report notes that there is no consensus
on the merits of, or need for, interim measures, and does not make a
recommendation for their introduction; The Interim Report agreed by the
more than 110 members of the Inclusive Framework outlines a number of
areas where there are clear differences of view among the countries, including
over the need for future reform of the international tax system; The
Interim Report provides a sense of direction that reflects the commitment
of the Inclusive Framework members to work towards a consensus-based, global
solution on these matters; The Interim report sets the goal of
producing a final report in 2020, with an update to the G20 in 2019; The
Interim Report notes that the "members agreed to undertake a coherent and
concurrent review of the “nexus” and “profit allocation” rules - fundamental
concepts relating to the allocation of taxing rights between jurisdictions and
the determination of the relevant share of the multinational enterprise’s
profits that will be subject to taxation in a given jurisdiction";
The Interim Report discusses interim measures that some countries have
indicated they would implement, believing that there is a strong imperative to
act quickly; The Interim Report specifically considers an interim measure in
the form of an 'excise tax' on the supply of certain e-services within their
jurisdiction that would apply to the gross consideration paid for the supply of
such e-services; The Inclusive Framework’s Task Force on the Digital Economy
will meet next in July 2018; The report cites India has adopted rules for
the VAT treatment of B2C supplies of services and intangibles by foreign
suppliers in accordance with the OECD International VAT/GST Guidelines; The
Interim report also describes in details India's Significant Economic
Presence based taxation, Equalisation levy & cites Bangalore ITAT ruling
on “virtual service PE”
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
CBDT issues second round of frequently asked questions in relation to Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024
This Tax Alert summarizes Circular No. 19/2024 dated 16 December 2024 (VSV 2- December Circular) issued by the Central Board of Direct Tax...
-
PCIT vs. The Executor of Estate of Late Smt. Manjula A. Shah (Bombay High Court) S. 50C Capital Gains: The valuation of the stamp autho...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Supreme Court (SC) [1] on availability of CENVAT Credit on mobile towers and pre-fabrica...
-
IFRS and US GAAP - Similarities and Differences What is IFRS? And what is GAAP? The main difference between IFRS and US GAAP is that G...
-
Madras HC reverses ITAT's order, grants deduction u/s. 80P(2)(a)(i) to assessee (a society engaged in the business of banking and provi...
-
SC dismisses assessee-company’s SLP challenging Bombay HC order upholding re-assessment initiation (beyond 4 yrs period) based on a special...
-
SC dismisses Revenue’s SLP challenging Bombay HC order in case of assessee (belonging to Lodha group of companies engaged in real estate bu...
-
Claiming a foreign tax credit (FTC) in Australia allows companies to offset foreign taxes paid on income earned overseas against their Aust...
-
HC allows HDFC Bank’s writ petition, quashes AO’s order and subsequent reference to TPO alleging that certain related party transactions [p...
-
Delhi ITAT deletes Rs. 1558.57 cr. capital gains addition on Telenor India for AY 2014-15, holds that set off of non-refundable entry fee p...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Bombay High Court (HC)1 on admissibility of input tax credit (ITC) w.r.t GST on advance p...
No comments:
Post a Comment