Bangalore ITAT rejects
assessee-individual’s claim of ‘exempt’ long term capital gains (‘LTCG’) of Rs.
42 lakh arising on sale of ‘penny stocks’ during AY 2015-16, upholds AO’s stand
that the LTCG booked by assessee were bogus and the gains were assessable as
‘business income’; Rejects assessee’s stand that the genuineness of LTCG claim
cannot be doubted since the contract notes were placed on record and the
payment were made through cheques identifying the company whose shares were
transacted; Upon examining the financials of the company, ITAT observes that
the financial worth of the company was very meager and not worth to be invested
in, remarks that “With such financials, we are unable to understand how there
can be manifold increase in the shares.”; Further observes that taking
cognizance of BSE websites, money control website, investigation wing, SEBI
reports, AO had noted that the price of these shares saw phenomenal rise and
were constantly traded near the circuit limit (of 5%) so as to avail maximum
price rise without hitting and triggering the circuit limit, and thereby avoid
surveillance by the Stock Exchange Regulator; ITAT concludes that Revenue has
brought sufficient material on record to demonstrate that unaccounted money was
introduced in the books through LTCG by circuitous means.:ITAT
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
CBDT issues second round of frequently asked questions in relation to Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024
This Tax Alert summarizes Circular No. 19/2024 dated 16 December 2024 (VSV 2- December Circular) issued by the Central Board of Direct Tax...
-
PCIT vs. The Executor of Estate of Late Smt. Manjula A. Shah (Bombay High Court) S. 50C Capital Gains: The valuation of the stamp autho...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Supreme Court (SC) [1] on availability of CENVAT Credit on mobile towers and pre-fabrica...
-
IFRS and US GAAP - Similarities and Differences What is IFRS? And what is GAAP? The main difference between IFRS and US GAAP is that G...
-
Madras HC reverses ITAT's order, grants deduction u/s. 80P(2)(a)(i) to assessee (a society engaged in the business of banking and provi...
-
SC dismisses assessee-company’s SLP challenging Bombay HC order upholding re-assessment initiation (beyond 4 yrs period) based on a special...
-
SC dismisses Revenue’s SLP challenging Bombay HC order in case of assessee (belonging to Lodha group of companies engaged in real estate bu...
-
Claiming a foreign tax credit (FTC) in Australia allows companies to offset foreign taxes paid on income earned overseas against their Aust...
-
HC allows HDFC Bank’s writ petition, quashes AO’s order and subsequent reference to TPO alleging that certain related party transactions [p...
-
Delhi ITAT deletes Rs. 1558.57 cr. capital gains addition on Telenor India for AY 2014-15, holds that set off of non-refundable entry fee p...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Bombay High Court (HC)1 on admissibility of input tax credit (ITC) w.r.t GST on advance p...
No comments:
Post a Comment