Delhi ITAT holds
assessee-society (formed for organizing South Asian Federation Winter Games,
2009) liable to deduct TDS u/s. 194C on amount tendered as ‘advance’ to various
PSUs (Public Sector Undertakings) w.r.t. various works relating to construction
of the infrastructure for winter games for AYs 2009-10 & 2010-11; Rejects
assessee’s stand that it was merely a pass through entity that has been granted
sum for organizing the winter games and it did not enter into any contract with
the parties to whom payments were made; ITAT acknowledges that grants / sponsorship
received by the assessee, are in turn, disbursed to various recipients (i.e.
PSUs) who got the work done through contractors and deducted TDS on payments
made to such contractors; However, ITAT remarks that “Though the contractor may
be identified and engaged by the other organization, however, the
implementation and utilization is the sole responsibility of the assessee.
Otherwise, there is no other reason for the formation of the assessee society”;
Observes that as required u/s. 194C, assessee is the person responsible for
payments of sums to the PSUs, which infact was paid by the assessee; Clarifies
that “Merely because the assessee is provided grant for onward distribution to
these parties does not exclude the assessee from the liability for deduction of
tax at source u/s 194C”; W.r.t. assessee’s alternative argument that all the
recipients have already received the grant and if tax is recovered from the
assessee it ought to be refundable in the hands of the recipients, ITAT directs
the AO to verify as to whether due taxes have been paid by the recipients in
terms of the proviso to Sec. 201(1); Lastly, ITAT deletes penalty levied u/s.
271C absent contemptuous conduct on assessee’s part for non-deduction of TDS;
Separately in context of payments made to non-resident parties for equipment
supply, ITAT rules that Sec. 195 TDS shall not apply as no income has accrued
to those parties in India, in terms of Sections 5 & 9 of the Act and title
of the goods has passed outside India.:ITAT
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
CBDT issues second round of frequently asked questions in relation to Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024
This Tax Alert summarizes Circular No. 19/2024 dated 16 December 2024 (VSV 2- December Circular) issued by the Central Board of Direct Tax...
-
PCIT vs. The Executor of Estate of Late Smt. Manjula A. Shah (Bombay High Court) S. 50C Capital Gains: The valuation of the stamp autho...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Supreme Court (SC) [1] on availability of CENVAT Credit on mobile towers and pre-fabrica...
-
IFRS and US GAAP - Similarities and Differences What is IFRS? And what is GAAP? The main difference between IFRS and US GAAP is that G...
-
Madras HC reverses ITAT's order, grants deduction u/s. 80P(2)(a)(i) to assessee (a society engaged in the business of banking and provi...
-
SC dismisses assessee-company’s SLP challenging Bombay HC order upholding re-assessment initiation (beyond 4 yrs period) based on a special...
-
SC dismisses Revenue’s SLP challenging Bombay HC order in case of assessee (belonging to Lodha group of companies engaged in real estate bu...
-
Claiming a foreign tax credit (FTC) in Australia allows companies to offset foreign taxes paid on income earned overseas against their Aust...
-
HC allows HDFC Bank’s writ petition, quashes AO’s order and subsequent reference to TPO alleging that certain related party transactions [p...
-
Delhi ITAT deletes Rs. 1558.57 cr. capital gains addition on Telenor India for AY 2014-15, holds that set off of non-refundable entry fee p...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Bombay High Court (HC)1 on admissibility of input tax credit (ITC) w.r.t GST on advance p...
No comments:
Post a Comment