This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Gauhati High Court (HC) [1] on the validity of notifications extending the time limit to pass order under section 73(10) of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (CGST Act).
The key observations of the HC are:
- Since the
orders under dispute were passed basis the extension provided by
Notification no. 56/2023 (the Notification), the Court is not considering
challenge to Notification No. 9/2023 (earlier extension notification).
- There is no
denial to the fact that the Notification was issued without the
recommendation of the GST Council.
- In the
Notification, the Central Government for reasons best known, mentioned “on
the recommendations of the Council”, which on the face of it shows that
the exercise of power by the Government insofar as the Notification is
concerned, is a colourable exercise of power.
- Since the
Notification was issued without the recommendation, GST Council had no
occasion to consider existence of force majeure.
- Recommendations
to be made by the GST Council if required as per the provisions of the
Central Act or the State Act has to be construed to be a “sine qua non”
for exercise of power by the Union or the State Government.
Accordingly, the Court held that the Notification is ultra vires the CGST Act
and not legally sustainable in law.
However, since the Government has the power to issue retrospective notification
as per section 168A(2), the Court mentioned that this decision shall not
prejudice the Government to take such steps in the manner provided under law.
Comments
- While the
ruling provides relief to the taxpayers, tax department is likely to
litigate the matter before the apex court.
- It needs to be
seen whether the law makers initiate action by issuing notifications with
retrospective effect for such extensions once the GST Council makes
recommendation in subsequent meetings.
- It is relevant
to note that both Notification 56/2023-CT and Notification no. 9/2023-CT
are challenged in multiple writs before various High Courts.
- The ruling
highlights interpretation of the term ’recommendation’ in the context of
GST law.
- The taxpayer
needs to analyze the impact of this decision by identifying the cases
where order has been passed basis the extension provided by the
Notification.
No comments:
Post a Comment