Since the gift is given by your son, it is not taxable as per the new amended provision u/s 56 of the I T Act. If you forgot to show this amount , its not big fault because the fact is that you have rceived the gift from Son. But , in my opinion , you should show the receipt of gift from son and claim the exemption of the amount . For this , i suggest you get a letter from son whereby he gives all details what he does i.e what is his source of income and the mode of payment of gift.There is no limit for receiving the money from your relatives residing outside India , as far as my knowledge goes.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Supreme Court Clarifies Excise Duty Treatment for Closing Stock
The Supreme Court (SC) , in the case of Lakshmi Sugar Mills Co. Ltd. , has ruled that unpaid excise duty on finished goods lying in a bond...
-
A new website launched for TDS related matters www.tdscpc.gov.in TRACES – T DS R econciliation A nalysis and C orrection E nabling S yste...
-
Slump sale is transfer of one or more business undertakings for a lump sum consideration, without assigning individual values to the each...
-
CIT vs. The Instalment Supply Ltd (Delhi High Court) The assessee bought 1614 items of computer systems for Rs.40 lacs from HCL Hewlett ...
-
Key features of File Validation Utility (FVU) version 3.3 FVU 3.3 will be applicable for quarterly TDS/ TCS statements pertaining to...
-
01. TDS u/s 194J is required to be done for Royalty also w.e.f 13-7-2006. 02. Royalty had been defined under explanation 2 of se...
-
Facts Centrica India Offshore Private Limited (CIO), an Indian Company, is a wholly owned subsidiary of Centrica Plc, UK Centrica Plc a...
-
SREI Infrastructure Finance Ltd vs. ITSC (Delhi High Court) The assessee entered into a scheme of arrangement u/s 391-394 of the Compani...
-
Until now, 'Samaritans' is not how the Independent Directors are purported by Clause 49 in the Listing agreement. An Independ...
-
Facts The applicant („A‟) is a closely held Public Limited company incorporated in India in the year 1953. A‟s shareholder included A (...
-
THE issues before the Bench are - Whether benefits of Sec 80IA(4) are available only to a company and not to persons like HUF, firm and Ind...
No comments:
Post a Comment