Monday, 31 March 2025

Government amends CGST Rules and issues further clarifications w.r.t. Amnesty scheme under GST

 This Tax Alert summarizes the recent Notification[1] and Circular[2] issued by Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) addressing certain issues related to availment of benefit of amnesty scheme under Section 128A of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (CGST Act).


Section 128A and Rule 164 were inserted in the CGST Act and Rules respectively, to provide for waiver of interest and penalty w.r.t certain tax demands pertaining to the period from 1 July 2017 to 31 March 2020.

Earlier, Circular No. 238/32/2024-GST dated 15 October 2024 was issued by CBIC to clarify various issues related to implementation of the said provisions. Based on further representations concerning applicability of amnesty scheme in cases where payments have been made through GSTR-3B instead of DRC-03, and the consolidated demand notices or adjudication orders have been issued covering period other than those specified under Section 128A. CBIC has clarified as follows:

  • Taxpayers who have made payment before 1 November 2024 via GSTR-3B, prior to the issuance of demand notice and/or adjudication order, shall also be eligible for benefit under Section 128A. However, for those who wish to take the benefit of the scheme after its implementation, payment must be made through DRC-03, in accordance with Rule 164. 
  • If notice or order pertains to the period partially covered under Section 128A and partially beyond the said period, Rule 164 have been amended to allow taxpayers to apply for the amnesty scheme after paying their tax liability for the period covered under the scheme. They must then inform the Appellate Authority or Tribunal of their intent to avail the benefit of Section 128A and withdraw the appeal for the relevant period. The Appellate Authority or Tribunal shall consider the request and issue appropriate order for the remaining period.

However, no refund shall be available of any tax, interest or penalty, which has already been discharged, for the entire period covered in the notice or order, before the above amendment.

Comments:


  • The above clarification and amendment are likely to help all affected taxpayers who wish to avail the benefit of the amnesty scheme and close the litigation.
  • Not allowing refund of the demand already paid for the period outside the scheme in a consolidated demand notice or adjudication order places such taxpayer at a disadvantageous situation vis-à-vis those who would not have to pay such demand post amendment.



[1]  Notification No. 11/2025 – Central Tax dated 27 March 2025

[2] Circular No.  248/05/2025-GST dated 27 March 2025

No comments:

Is Opting for Section 115BAA Like a Life Sentence? Debunking the Myth

The introduction of Section 115BAA under the Income Tax Act, 1961 offered a lucrative flat tax rate for domestic companies in exchange for f...