Thursday, 31 October 2013
India Taxes- Due Date Alert for the month November 2013
Sr No
|
Due Date
|
Related to
|
Compliance to be made
|
1
|
05.11.2013
|
Service Tax
|
Payment of Service Tax for the Month of October 2013
|
2
|
07.11.2013
|
TDS/TCS
(Income Tax)
|
·
Deposit TDS for payments of Salary, Interest, Commission or Brokerage, Rent,
Professional fee, payment to Contractors, etc. during the month of
October 2013.
·
Deposit TDS from Salaries deducted during the month of October 2013
•
Deposit TCS for collections made under section 206C including
sale of scrap during the month of October 2013, if any
•
Deliver a copy of Form 15G/15H, if any to CCIT or CIT for
declarations received in the month of October 2013, if any
|
3
|
20.11.2013
|
VAT
|
Payment of VAT & filing of monthly return for the month of
October 2013
|
4
|
30.11.2013
|
Income Tax
|
Return filing online along with
submission of Form 3CEB in the case, assessee is subject to transactions with
AEs and TP study required.
|
5
|
20.11.2013
|
STPI
|
Submission of Softex forms for the month
ended October 2013
|
No TAN Only PAN for TDS on Purchase of Immovable Property w.e.f. 01 Jun. 2013.
Any person purchasing immovable property (other than rural agricultural
land) of Rs. 50 Lac or more is required to deduct Tax @ 1% from the payment made to seller.
Deduct TDS
Deduct TDS
- Deduct Tax @ 1% from the payment made to the seller.
- Collect the PAN of the seller and verify the same with the origional PAN Card.
Under Explanation 1 to s. 271(1)(c), voluntary disclosure of concealed income does not absolve assessee of s. 271(1)(c) penalty if the assessee fails to offer an explanation which is bona fide and proves that all the material facts have been disclosed
MAK Data P. Ltd vs. CIT (Supreme Court)
The assessee filed a return of income for AY 2004-05 declaring an income of Rs.16 lakhs. During the course of the assessment proceedings, the AO noticed certain documents comprising of share application forms, bank statements, blank share transfer deeds etc had been impounded in the course of s. 133A
Whether when assessee, subsidiary of a foreign company, incures certain expenses for acquiring shares from parent for alloting the same under ESOP to employees, such expenses are to be allowed as revenue expenditure - YES: ITAT
THE issues before the Bench are - Whether when the assessee, a
subsidiary of a foreign company, incures certain expenses for acquiring shares
from the parent for alloting the same under ESOP to an employee, such expenses,
which represent the difference with the fair market value, are to be allowed as
revenue expenditure and Whether expenses incurred for the benefit of third party
are not allowable if the same are incurred on account of commercial expediency.
And the verdict goes in favour of the assessee.
Facts of the
case
Whether voluntary disclosure of income for avoiding litigation and opting for amicable settlement can be a sufficient defence to avoid penalty u/s 271(1)(C) - NO: Supreme Court
THE issues before the Bench are - Whether a disclosure of
income can be treated as voluntary when the offer of surrender was made in view
of detection made by the AO in the search conducted in the sister concern of the
assessee; Whether voluntary disclosure can release an assessee from the mischief
of penal proceedings; Whether in view of this, voluntary disclosure of income
for avoiding litigation and opting for amicable settlement can be a sufficient
defence to avoid penalty u/s 271(1)(C), in the absence of any explanation for
concealment of particulars of income or furnishing inaccurate particulars of
income and Whether the satisfaction to be recorded by the AO for initiation of
penalty proceedings is required to be recorded in a particular manner or reduced
into writing. And the verdict goes against the assessee.
Facts of the
case
Wednesday, 30 October 2013
Classifying Asset and Liability Transactions under IAS 1
Classifying transactions into accounts is a crucial step in the
accounting process. Asset and liability transactions are the biggest portion of
the whole accounting data. Classifying transactions into asset and liability
group, under the IAS 1, is a big challenge, for those who implement IFRS for the
first time. This post helps starters to understand the process of classifying
asset and liability transactions, under the IAS 1.
But before the main topic, let us have a look at a quick overview of statement of financial position.
But before the main topic, let us have a look at a quick overview of statement of financial position.
Deduction of taxes on payment made to Non Residents would apply, even if the property is being sold by way of general power of attorney
Bangalore Tax Tribunal has upheld that the provisions of section 195 which
mandates for deduction of taxes on payment made to Non Residents would apply,
even if the property is being sold by way of general power of attorney executed
in favour of a resident in India.
The Facts of Case is as below :
The Facts of Case is as below :
How to Calculate Income-Tax to be deducted from Salary for Asstt. Year 2014-15.
RCULAR NO : 08 /2013 F.No. 275/192/2013-IT(B)
Dated 10th October, 2013
Salary income for the purpose of section 192 shall be computed as follow:-
Dated 10th October, 2013
Salary income for the purpose of section 192 shall be computed as follow:-
- First compute the gross salary as mentioned in para 5.1 including all the incomes mentioned in para 5.2 and excluding the income mentioned in para 5.3.
- Allow deductions mentioned in para 5.4 from the figure arrived at (a) above and compute the amount to arrive at Net salary of the employee
- Add income from all other heads- House property, Profits & gains of Business or Profession, capital gains and Income from other Sources to arrive at the Gross
Whether when AO had no occasion to verify shares transactions, which were considered as bogus based on inputs from Investigation wing and for which full particulars were not furnished in original proceedings, it can still be stated that there was change of opinion while issuing notice u/s 148 - NO: HC
THE issue before the Bench is - Whether when the assessing
officer did not have any occasion to verify the shares transactions, which were
considered as bogus based on the information from investigation wing and for
which full particulars were not furnished by the assessee in original assessment
proceedings, it can still be stated that there was change of opinion while
issuing notice u/s 148 of the Income tax Act. NO is the HC's answer.
Whether if assessee or its representative is not present at time of hearing, Tribunal has authority to dismiss the case for default - NO: Bombay HC
THE issues before the Bench are - Whether in case assessee or its
representatives were not present at the time of hearing, Tribunal has the
authority to dismiss the same for default. And the answer is
NO.
Facts of the case
Benefits under MAP Process
The Taxpayer had initiated MAP under India-USA Double Tax Avoidance Agreement (US DTAA) through its US Competent Authority (US CA) in respect of its Indian transactions for certain specific tax years. Having regard to the Memorandum of Understanding regarding Deferment of Assessment and/or Suspension of Collection of Taxes during Mutual Agreement Procedure (MOU) entered into between CAs of India and the US, the Indian Tax Authority had, for these tax years, passed orders confirming nil tax withholding while making payments to the Taxpayer. The Taxpayer thereafter requested CA of the US to include one more tax y
Tuesday, 29 October 2013
Forex Rate for Service tax
[TO BE PUBLISHED IN
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA, PART-II, SECTION 3, SUB-SECTION (ii),
EXTRAORDINARY]
GOVERNMENT OF
INDIA
MINISTRY OF
FINANCE
DEPARTMENT OF
REVENUE
CENTRAL BOARD OF
EXCISE AND CUSTOMS
Notification No.105/2013-Customs
(N.T.)
Dated the
17th October, 2013
25
Asvina, 1935(SAKA)
Whether when assessee makes huge investment for acquiring controlling stake in loss-making company, its expenditure warrants disallowance u/s 14A for lack of earning dividend income - NO: ITAT
THE issue
before the Bench is - Whether when the assessee makes huge investment
for acquiring controlling stake in a loss-making company, its
expenditure warrants disallowance u/s 14A for the lack of earning
dividend income. And the verdict favours the assessee.
Whether if assessee or its representative is not present at time of hearing, Tribunal has authority to dismiss the case for default - NO: Bombay HC
THE issues before the Bench are - Whether
in case assessee or its representatives were not present at the time
of hearing, Tribunal has the authority to dismiss the same for default.
And the answer is NO.
Facts of the case
Conversion of firm into company held taxable since revaluation profit recorded as loanConversion of firm into company held taxable since revaluation profit recorded as loan
In a recent decision in the case of KTC
Automobiles Private Limited (“KTC”
or “the taxpayer”), the Cochin Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (“ITAT” or
“the Tribunal”), has denied capital gain exemption
upon conversion of partnership firm into private limited company under
section 47(xiii) of the Income‑tax Act, 1961 (“the Act”). The
taxpayer-firm had converted into a company and treated the balance in
the partners’ current account as loans in the books of
the company in this case and hence, the Tribunal ruled that the
exemption conditions listed down under section 47(xiii) of the Act for non-taxability of the capital gains were violated.
Monday, 28 October 2013
TDS on Provident Fund and Superannuation Fund for Asstt. Year 2014-15
The trustees of a Recognized Provident Fund, or any person authorized by the regulations of the Fund to make payment of accumulated balances due
to employees, shall in cases where sub-rule(1) of Rule 9 of Part A of the Fourth Schedule to the Act applies, at the time when the accumulated
balance due to an employee is
paid, make therefrom the deduction specified in Rule 10 of Part A of the
Fourth Schedule to the Act.
The accumulated balance is treated as income
chargeable under the head
“Salaries”.
Where any contribution made by an employer, including interest on such contributions, if any, in an approved Superannuation Fund is paid to the employee, tax on the amount so paid shall be deducted by the trustees of the Fund to the extent provided in Rule 6 of Part B of the Fourth Schedule to the Act. TDS should be at the average rate of tax at which, the employee was liable to be taxed during the preceding three years or during the period, if that period is less than three years, when he was member of the fund.
The deductor shall remain liable to deduct tax on any sum paid on account of returned contributions (including interest, if any) even if a fund or part of a fund ceases to be an approved Superannuation fund.
Where any contribution made by an employer, including interest on such contributions, if any, in an approved Superannuation Fund is paid to the employee, tax on the amount so paid shall be deducted by the trustees of the Fund to the extent provided in Rule 6 of Part B of the Fourth Schedule to the Act. TDS should be at the average rate of tax at which, the employee was liable to be taxed during the preceding three years or during the period, if that period is less than three years, when he was member of the fund.
The deductor shall remain liable to deduct tax on any sum paid on account of returned contributions (including interest, if any) even if a fund or part of a fund ceases to be an approved Superannuation fund.
Incomes not included under the head "Salaries" (Exemptions).
Any income falling within any of the following
clauses shall not be included in
computing the income from salaries
for the purpose of section 192 of the Act :-
The value of any travel concession or assistance received by or due to an employee from his employer or former employer for himself and his family, in connection with his proceeding (a) on leave to any place in India or (b) after retirement from service, or, after termination of service to any place in India is exempt under Section 10(5) subject, however, to the conditions prescribed in Rule 2B of the Rules.
For the purpose of this clause, "family" in relation to an individual means:
The value of any travel concession or assistance received by or due to an employee from his employer or former employer for himself and his family, in connection with his proceeding (a) on leave to any place in India or (b) after retirement from service, or, after termination of service to any place in India is exempt under Section 10(5) subject, however, to the conditions prescribed in Rule 2B of the Rules.
For the purpose of this clause, "family" in relation to an individual means:
Getting PAN Card in India by Foreign Nationals or Non Resident Indian
If you are an NRI or foreign national and you have a taxable income in India
then buck up and get a PAN card. Getting PAN Card in India by Foreign Nationals
or Non Resident Indian is not that difficult. Okay, now even if you don’t have a
taxable income but you are into share trading through broker or depository or
you invest in mutual funds or are purchasing any land or property in India, then
you need a PAN card issued by the Government of India.
Now, if you do not know how to get a PAN card keep on reading. It is quite simple to get a PAN
Now, if you do not know how to get a PAN card keep on reading. It is quite simple to get a PAN
A Co-op Hsg Society is not a mutual association because its members can earn income from its property. The transfer fee and TDR premium charged by the Society from its members is a commercial transaction and not eligible for exemption on grounds of mutuality
Hatkesh Co-op Housing Society Ltd vs. ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
The assessee, a co-operative housing society, received transfer fee and TDR premium from its members which it claimed was exempt on the ground of mutuality. This stand was upheld by the Tribunal for the earlier years relying on the judgements in Sind Co-op Housing Society 317 ITR 47 (Bom), Mittal Court Premises Co-op Society 320 ITR 414 (Bom) & Jai Hind CHS Ltd 349 ITR 541 (Bom). In the present year, the Department argued that this view was not correct and that the transfer fee and TDR premium were not exempt on the
Friday, 25 October 2013
Deductions u/s. 80CCG (New Equity Saving Scheme) for Asstt. Year 2014-15.
Newly inserted Section 80CCG provides deduction wef assessment year 2013-14 in respect of investment
made under notified equity saving scheme. Rajiv Gandhi Equity Savings
Scheme 2012 has been notified vide SO No 2777 dated
23.11.2012 as a scheme under this section. The
deduction under this section is available if following
conditions are satisfied:
Free supplied materials includible in the valuation of taxable services vide Circular No. 80/10/2004- ST dated 17-09-2004 read with Notification No. 15/2004-ST dated 10-09-2004.
Paharpur Cooling Towers ltd. vs. Commissioner of C. Ex. Raipur – (2013 (31) STR 227 (Tri.-Del)
Facts:
The appellant did not include the value of free supplied materials in the gross amount of taxable services and claimed abatement under commercial orindustrial construction videNotification No.1S/2004-ST dated 10-09-2004. The appellant further did not pay service tax on advances received and also availed the benefit of CENVAT credit.
Whether income received by assessee by sub-leasing of leased out property and from maintenance and airconditioning hire charges has to be assessed as income from House Property or business income - HC partly rules against Revenue
THE issues before the Bench are - Whether the income received
by the assessee by sub-leasing of already leased out property and from
maintenance charges and air conditioning hire charges, is to be assessed as
Income from House Property and not income from business; Whether when the rental
income falls within the specific head of "income from house property", the mere
fact of the assessee having business in letting out the property as stated in
its memorandum, by
Service tax is payable on equity research as market research agency.
M/s. Kotak Security Ltd. vs. CST, Mumbai-I. (2013 – TIOL – 1054- CESTAT-MUM)
Facts:
The Appellant conducted equity research and prepared research reports on the financials of listed companies for their affiliate company M/s. Kotak Mahindra Capital Company Ltd. (KMCC) and received research fees on which no service tax was paid. An SCN demanding tax, interest and penalties was issued to the Appellant under the category Market Research Services".
Tribunal has no power to dismiss appeal for non-appearance of appellant. It has to deal with the merits. An application for recall of an ex-parte dismissal order is under s. 254(2) & must be filed within 4 years from the date of the order. The Tribunal must permit “mentioning” of matters
Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd vs. ITAT (Bombay High Court)
The assessee’s appeal was fixed for hearing before the Tribunal on 4.12.2007. As nobody appeared for the assessee, the Tribunal dismissed the appeal for want of prosecution. The assessee filed a Miscellaneous Application before the Tribunal on 6.8.2012 seeking to recall the exparte order. The Tribunal dismissed
Thursday, 24 October 2013
Madras HC rules income under time charter arrangement for ships as “royalty”
This tax alert summarises a recent ruling of the Madras High Court in the case of Poompuhar Shipping Corporation Ltd. (PSCL) and West Asia Maritime Ltd. (WAML) on the issue of whether hire charge for chartering Indian coastal shipping vessels (ships) for plying within Indian ports under time-charter arrangement (TCA) and bare-boat charter-cum-demise (BBCD) arrangement, with various foreign shipping companies (FSCs), is taxable in India as“royalty”, under the Indian Tax Laws (ITL) as well as under the Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA). While determining taxability under TCA and BBCD, the HC dealt with a number of issues, viz., (a) whether a ship qualifies as equipment, (b) whether charges under TCA and BBCD are for the “use” or “right to use” such equipment and, consequently, taxable as royalty, (c) availability of benefit of Article 8 of the DTAA dealing with shipping income, (d) trigger of permanent establishment (PE) for FSCs by virtue of presence of ships in India, (e) whether parallel proceedings, as payer-in-default and representative agent (Agent) against the payer, is permissible under the ITL.
Condition to Claim Deduction of House Loan Interest u/s. 24(b) for Asstt. Year 2014-15
There are two main benefits which are available under Income Tax Act, 1961 in
relation to Purchase or Construction of
House Property which are described as under:
Penalty for failure TDS Return in Time or Incorrect Information u/s. 271H.
If a person fails to deliver or caused to be delivered a statement within the
time prescribed in section 200(3) or furnishes an incorrect statement, in
respect of tax deducted at source on or after 1.07.2012, he shall be liable to
pay, by way of penalty a sum which
shall not be less than Rs. 10,000/- but which may extend to Rs 1,00,000/-.
However, the penalty shall not be levied if the person
proves that after paying TDS with the fee and interest, if any, to the credit of Central Government, he had
delivered such statement before the expiry of one year from the time prescribed for delivering the
statement.
Whether even if assessee does not claim expenditure of interest liable to TDS u/s 194A, it cannot escape the rigour of Sec 40(a)(ia) - YES: ITAT
THE issue before the Bench is - Whether even if the
assessee does not claim the expenditure of interest liable to tax deduction at
source u/s 194A, it cannot escape the rigour of Sec 40(a)(ia). And the answer
goes against the assessee.
Facts of the
case
Tax Audit due date extented
F.No.
225/117/2013-ITA.II
Government of IndiaMinistry of
FinanceDepartment of RevenueCentral Board of Direct Taxes
Dated : October 24,
2013
Order under Section 119 of
the income-tax Act. 1961
In exercise of powers conferred under section 119 of the Income-tax 1961, the Central Board of Direct Taxes, in continuation to order u/s 119 dated 26.09.2013 in F.No. 225/117/2013/1TA.II, hereby directs that in cases where the 'due date' of furnishing reports of audit and corresponding income-tax returns was 30th September, 2013 and where the same are furnished electronically on or before 31st October, 2013, such reports of audit and returns of income shall be deemed to have been furnished within the 'due date' prescribed under section 139 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
(Rohit Garg)Deputy-Secretary
to Govt. of India
Members in practice - Annual eFiling
Kind attention : Members in practice - Annual
eFiling
Members in practice may kindly note that the Ministry of Corporate Affairs, Govt. of India has recently advised that it would not entertain/accede to any request for extension of last date for e-Filing beyond the expiry/specified date concerned. In this regard in an advisory issued by the Ministry, it has been emphasized that suitable steps be taken to expedite filing of balance sheet and annual return to avoid last minute rush and system congestion in MCA 21 towards the end of October and November, 2013. In other words, request to all professionals and corporates concerned is that one should not wait for the last date of the month concerned for Annual Filing. Members concerned are accordingly requested to do the needful.
Wednesday, 23 October 2013
Confused about taxes on income from shares?
Confused about taxation of any
income arising in respect of shares, be it capital gains on sale of such shares or dividends received?
People generally think that any income received in respect of shares is exempt from tax. This is really not
so.
Is import export code for export of services is also required ?
Service providers, who are also rendering services outside India always had
this doubt, whether they also need to get themselves registered and get Import
Export Code. This article would address whether import export code for export
of services is also required.
IEC stands for Import Export Code. It is a 10 digit number which is allotted by the director general of foreign trade (DGFT), Ministry of Commerce.
Check service tax applicability on online services rendered outside India
Say, a person in Mumbai is in the business of producing films and has a
website on which the films are uploaded. Now, if a person sitting in USA
downloads the film and makes the payment in foreign exchange, will it be an
export of service? Well, think about the place of provision of service for the
given case study! In case of online information and database access or retrieval
services, the place of provision of service is the location of service provider.
So, as per the said rule, the place of provision of service is Mumbai.
Consequently, there is no export of service. This article will check service
tax applicability on online services rendered outside
India.
Now, which services would constitute as an online information and database access or retrieval
Now, which services would constitute as an online information and database access or retrieval
Re-opening of Income Tax assessment and Things to keep in Mind
n this article we would discuss Re-opening of Income Tax assessment and Things
to keep in Mind, as this has become one of the crucial subject in the area of
income tax. Frankly speaking, an authority is not permitted to revise an earlier
order merely on the basis of whims or fancies or upon change of opinion due to
subsequent events.However, we know that to err is human. So the same holds for
the income tax department. Despite care and diligence, there can be instances
where after passing the assessment order it may come to the light that income
which should have been charged to tax had escaped assessment.
So, let us know when can an assessing officer re open an assessment. An AO should comply with all the following requirements before re opening an assessment:
Form 15CA and Form 15CB – Accountant’s certificate for foreign payments
In this article, for the benefit of our reader’s we have come up with
detailed FAQ on procedures of issuance, requirement of Form 15CA and Form 15CB –
Accountant’s certificate for foreign payments
Q: CBDT has revised the guidelines on form 15CA and form 15CB.From when did the revised forms come into force?
Whether exemption u/s 10B can be denied merely on the basis that confirmation regarding export sale has not been received till date of making such claim - NO: HC
THE issues before the Bench are - Whether exemption u/s 10B can be
denied merely on the basis that confirmation regarding export sale has not been
received till the date of making such claim; Whether exemption can be denied,
even if assessee has made complete disclosure in its books of accounts and
Whether penalty for concealment can be warranted in such a case. And the verdict
goes against the Revenue.
Facts of the case
Tuesday, 22 October 2013
Bangalore Tribunal rules on deductibility of employee share reward discount cross-charged by foreign parent company
This Tax Alert summarizes a ruling of the Bangalore Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (Tribunal) in the case of Novo Nordisk India Pvt. Ltd.(Taxpayer) on the issue of deductibility of expenditure incurred on providing shares of the Taxpayer’s parent company, being a foreign company (FCo), to the Taxpayer’s employees under an Employee Share Purchase Scheme (ESPS). The Tribunal held that the ESPS discount cross-charged by FCo was an employee cost, wholly and exclusively incurred for the purpose of the Taxpayer’s business and hence, to be allowed as revenue expenditure, irrespective of the fact that FCo stood to benefit indirectly by such an expenditure.
Interest, Penalty & Prosecution for Failure to Deposit Tax Deducted for Asstt. Year 2014-15
If a person fails to deduct the
whole or any part of the tax at
source, or, after deducting, fails to pay the whole or any part of
the tax to the credit of the Central Government within the prescribed time,
he shall be liable to action in accordance with the provisions of section 201
and shall be deemed to be an assessee-in-default in respect of such tax and
liable for penal action u/s 221 of the Act. Further Section 201(1A) lays down
that such person shall be liable to pay simple interest
Deductions of Higher Education Loan u/s. 80E for Asstt. Year 2014-15.
Section 80E allows deduction in respect of
payment of interest on loan taken from any financial institution or any approved
charitable institution for higher education for the purpose of pursuing his
higher education or for the purpose of higher education of his spouse or his
children or the student for whom he is the legal guardian.
Whether in case manufacturing activity is performed by a third party, assessee can claim deduction u/s 80I in respect of such manufactured items: HC
THE issues before the Bench are - Whether service charges received
from Department of Atomic Energy can be considered as profit derived from the
industrial undertaking to qualify for deduction u/s 80I; Whether crane hire
charges would also be covered under equipment hire charges; Whether
transportation activities can be a part of manufacturing process, hence eligible
for deduction u/s 80I and Whether in case manufacturing activity is performed by
a third party, assessee can claim deduction u/s 80I in respect of such
manufactured items also. And the answers to all the questions go against the
Revenue.
Facts of the case
Whether Revenue is under obligation to allow TDS Credit even if deductors have not issued TDS Certificates nor properly uploaded details in Form 26AS - YES: ITAT
THE issue before the Bench is - Whether Revenue is under obligation
to allow TDS Credit even if deductors have not issued TDS Certificates nor
properly uploaded details in Form 26AS. And the verdict goes in favour of the
assessee.
Facts of the case
Monday, 21 October 2013
Is tax to be withheld on payments made by Indian company to a foreign company?
In this article we would analyse whether tax needs to be deducted on payments
made to foreign companies. In this world of globalization, where cross-border
transactions are the order of the day, there is often confusion and ambiguity
with regards to deduction or withholding of tax on payment made to foreign
companies.
Take, for example, a company situated in Bangalore,
engaged in rendering IT and ITES services to their clients worldwide, which
needs to pay marketing and business development fees to a company situated in
Denmark. Now, the question is whether the Indian company should deduct or
withhold taxes on payment made to the Denmark company.
Advance Pricing Agreement
The world’s taxing authorities are worried about multinational corporations
using intercompany transactions to shift earnings among subsidiaries to avoid
taxation.5 Similarly, corporations have been concerned about double taxation
that is, paying taxes on the same income to two or more countries.
Whether in case manufacturing activity is performed by a third party, assessee can claim deduction u/s 80I in respect of such manufactured items: HC
THE issues before the Bench are - Whether service charges received
from Department of Atomic Energy can be considered as profit derived from the
industrial undertaking to qualify for deduction u/s 80I; Whether crane hire
charges would also be covered under equipment hire charges; Whether
transportation activities can be a part of manufacturing process, hence eligible
for deduction u/s 80I and Whether in case manufacturing activity is performed by
a third party, assessee can claim deduction u/s 80I in respect of such
manufactured items also. And the answers to all the questions go against the
Revenue.
Facts of the case
Due Date for Filing Service Tax Return for April-September 2013 is 25th October 2013
Service tax is charged on the taxable amount of services rendered by the
service provider. Every assessee, whether Individual, Partnership firm, Company
or others are required to file a service tax return within the due date if they
are holding a Service Tax Registration Number and Certificate. The return
filing is mandatory irrespective of taxable service provided during the period
or not. Thus, an assessee who has no taxable service is also required to file a
NIL Service Tax Return. Due Date for Filing Service Tax Return for
April-September 2013 is 25th October 2013.
DUE DATE FOR FILING SERVICE TAX RETURN
The filing of the Service Tax Return is done on half yearly basis. The due date is 25th of the succeeding month of the half year end.
Who is assessee in default under the Income Tax Act and its consequences thereof
Any assessee if fails to pay off whole or part of the demand raised by the
Income Tax Authorities under section 156 within 30 days of its receipt, is
usually termed as assessee in default.
Consequences of being an Assessee in Default :-
1) Interest u/s 220: Simple interest @ 1% per month is payable on the amount remaining unpaid. The interest shall be charged for the period beginning from the day immediately following the 30 days as aforesaid and ending on the date on which payment is made. (here part of the month is considered as full month)
The interest under section 220 can be reduced or waived by the Chief CIT or CIT subject to certain conditions. This section also provides that if Chief CIT or CIT issues order to reduce the amount to be payable as tax due then the interest shall be reduced accordingly and the excess interest paid, if any, shall be refunded.
Consequences of being an Assessee in Default :-
1) Interest u/s 220: Simple interest @ 1% per month is payable on the amount remaining unpaid. The interest shall be charged for the period beginning from the day immediately following the 30 days as aforesaid and ending on the date on which payment is made. (here part of the month is considered as full month)
The interest under section 220 can be reduced or waived by the Chief CIT or CIT subject to certain conditions. This section also provides that if Chief CIT or CIT issues order to reduce the amount to be payable as tax due then the interest shall be reduced accordingly and the excess interest paid, if any, shall be refunded.
Whether when assessee fails to receive alimony and then settles her past and future claims for lumpsum amount, such receipt is capital in nature - YES: ITAT
THE issues before the Bench are - Whether when the assessee
fails to receive her alimony and then she settles her past and future claims for
certain lumpsum amount, such receipt is to be treated as capital receipt and
Whether accumulated monthly installments of alimony can be taxed u/s 56(2)(vi).
And the verdict goes against Revenue.
Facts of the
case
High Court irked by apathy of Government towards the (non) working of the Sales-tax Tribunal despite 4000 pending appeals with revenue effect of Rs. 4,500 crore
Sales Tax Tribunal Bar Association vs. State (Bombay High Court) (No. 2)
The Sales Tax Tribunal Bar Association filed a Writ Petition seeking certain directions relating to appointment of Members of the Sales Tax Tribunal. The High Court passed an order dated 06.09.2013 in which it expressed surprise that despite revenue of about Rs.4,500 crores which was locked up on account of pending litigation, the Government had not bothered to fill vacancies in the post of Members. The Government sought 4 weeks to consider the matter. Now HELD by the High Court:
Wednesday, 16 October 2013
Understanding Carry Forward of Losses:
Introduction :
It is an inherent feature of a tax system that collects tax on profits but does not provide full relief for losses (i.e. does not pay out an equivalent ‘negative tax’ on negative profits) that provision needs to be made to allow unrelieved losses to be carried over and offset against past and future profits if manifest inequity is to be avoided. A rational system of taxation has
SALE OF IMMOVABLE PROPERTY OWNED BY NRI
Legalities involved in the purchase of immovable assets by NRIs have been
discussed in the earlier column. Here we will discuss the legal requirements and
formalities to be complied with for sale off immovable assets owned by NRIs.
US GAAP - PHILOSOPHY
The philosophy of accounting is the conceptual framework for the professional preparation and auditing of financial statements and accounts. The issues which arise include the difficulty of establishing a true and fair value of an enterprise and its assets; the moral basis of disclosure and discretion; the standards and laws required to satisfy the political needs of investors, employees and
CHANGES IN ESUGAM - KARNATAKA VAT
NEW NOTIFICATION
In exercise of the powers vested under
Sub-section 2-A of Section 53 of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003(Karnataka Act No. 32 of 2004) and in
suppression of the Notification No. ADCOM (I&C)/P.A./CR-31/2011-12 dated 23-
12-2011, Karnataka Commercial Tax Department has issued Notification dated
09/10/2013 and it will come into effect from 01-11-2013.
HOW TO AVOID SCRUTINY
Every year date for submitting of ITR-V is
extended beyond 30th Sep. This
year CBDT has extended the date for for receipt of ITR-Vs in CPC,
Bengaluru, for the cases of AY 2012-13 and 2011-12 received in e-filed in FY
2012-13 to 31St October 2013.
Whether legal fiction created u/s 50 can also curb application of Sec 54EC if assessee makes investment in tax-free bonds - NO: Gujarat HC
THE issues before the Bench are - Whether the legal fiction
created u/s 50 can also curb application of Sec 54EC if assessee makes
investment in tax-free bonds and Whether exemption benefit u/s Sec 54EC
available for depreciable assets can also be availed on short term capital
gains. And the verdict goes against the Revenue.
Facts of the
case
Tuesday, 15 October 2013
No tax on FTS if service utilized for business carried abroad; upgradation of existing website is revenue exp.
In the instant case, two moot questions were
raised before the ITAT which were as under:
Procedure for filing TDS returns with insufficient deductee PAN
As per instructions issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT), it is
mandatory for deductors to file TDS/TCS returns with a threshold limit of Permanent Account Number (PAN) of
deductees. To facilitate deductors who face problem in filing TDS returns
because of insufficiency of PAN of the deductees and also to accommodate the
deductees who have intimated their PAN, the Income Tax Department (ITD) has specified the following procedure for filing TDS/TCS
returns:
STEPS TO BE TAKEN AFTER FILING OF E-TDS RETURN
Back up of Files
Deductor should take back-up of all the files generated after successful filing of E TDS return, more importantly back up of *.fvu file ( upload file ). *.fvu is the file which eventually is filed with the ITD through TIN FC. If the tds return is required to be revised at a later date, *.fvu file is required for making the necessary corrections.
Judgment on cargo handling services
lAC Air Services Pvt. Ltd. vs. CST, Delhi 2013 (31) STR 155 (Tri-Del.)
The appellant in this case had agreement with AAI for Cargo Handling Services at Delhi International Airport. They pleaded that, since tax is paid by main contractor they are not liable to pay any tax. The Tribunal observed that, various circulars and trade notices clarifyingseparate duty liability not to be carved out against assessee where principal service provider has discharged duty liability on entire value. It is held that, second time confirmationof duty cannot be upheld and therefore demand is set aside.
Non-residents are eligible for the benefit of 10% tax rate on long-term capital gains under the Proviso to s. 112. The AAR should avoid giving conflicting rulings
Cairn UK Holdings Ltd vs. DIT (Delhi High Court)
The assessee, a company based in Scotland, sold 4,36,00,000 equity shares of Cairn India Ltd to Petronas International, Malaysia, for consideration of US$ 241 Million. The sale was not through a stock exchange and resulted in long-term capital gain of US$ 85 Million in the hands of the assessee after applying the benefit under first proviso to s. 48. The assessee filed an application for advance
S. 10A/10B (when an “exemption” provision): Unabsorbed depreciation (and business loss) of same (s. 10A/10B) unit brought forward from earlier years have to be set off against the profits before computing exempt profits
Himatasingike Seide Ltd vs. CIT (Supreme Court)
The assessee set up a 100% EOU in AY 1988-89. For want of profits it did not claim benefits u/s 10B in AYs 1988-89 to 1990-91. From AY 1992-93 it claimed the said benefits for a connective period of 5 years. In AY 1994-95, the assessee computed the profits of the EOU without adjusting the brought forward unabsorbed depreciation of AY 1988-89. It claimed that as s. 10B conferred “exemption”for the profits of the EOU, the said brought forward depreciation could not be set-off from the profits of the EOU but was available to be set-off against income from other sources. It was also claimed that the profits had to be computed on a “commercial”basis. The AO accepted the claim though the CIT revised his order u/s 263 and directed that the exemption be computed after set-off. On appeal by the assessee, the Tribunal reversed the CIT. On appeal by the department, the High Court (CIT vs. Himatasingike Seide Ltd 286 ITR 255 (Kar)) reversed the Tribunal and held that the brought forward depreciation had to be adjusted against the profits of the EOU before computing the exemption allowable u/s 10B. On appeal by the assessee to the Supreme Court HELD dismissing the appeal:
Having perused the records and in view of the facts and circumstances of the case, we are of the opinion that the Civil Appeal being devoid of any merit deserves to be dismissed and is dismissed accordingly
Best CA Firms (Transfer Pricing) In India: International Tax Review
International
Tax Review, the prestigious publication on global transfer pricing and
international taxation issues has released a publication in which it has identified the best CA firms in
India specializing in transfer pricing matters.
Interestingly, the publication notes that India is among the “most aggressive” countries in making transfer pricing adjustments aggregating $9.5 billion. It also notes that India presents “special problems” in the transfer pricing world and refers to the recent unsavory incident in which the US competent authority had to state in public that it was “frustrated” by the position taken by his Indian counterpart and that the competent authority process between the US and India was “broken”.
Anyway, on the aspect of the best transfer pricing CA firm in India, the top roost is occupied, not surprisingly, by the Big 4 CA firms – Deloitte, E&Y, KPMG and PWC.
These firms were noted for employing several partners and staff specialists including economists, tax practitioners, legal experts and former officials of the income-tax department. International Tax Review noted that the team available with these firms have a variety of experience and skills and are able to deliver proficient advice in transfer pricing matters.
However, what is heartwarming is that a number of “desi” CA firms were also noted for their path breaking work in transfer pricing matters. T. P. Ostwal & Co came in for special mention for having a “notable presence” in the Indian transfer pricing market. T. P. Ostwal was complimented as a “very knowledgeable and notable” practitioner in this area.
K. C. Mehta & Co also came in for mention as a “key player” of transfer pricing practice in west India and for serving large multinational clients such as Schaeffeler, Panasonic etc.
The other CA firms which came into the radar for their top-quality transfer pricing work were GM Kapadia & Co, Khaitan & Co, MZSK & Associates, Nangia & Co & Majmudar & Partners.
We hope the day is not far when the local CA firms will be able to occupy the “Tier 1” position of transfer pricing advisers in India
Interestingly, the publication notes that India is among the “most aggressive” countries in making transfer pricing adjustments aggregating $9.5 billion. It also notes that India presents “special problems” in the transfer pricing world and refers to the recent unsavory incident in which the US competent authority had to state in public that it was “frustrated” by the position taken by his Indian counterpart and that the competent authority process between the US and India was “broken”.
Anyway, on the aspect of the best transfer pricing CA firm in India, the top roost is occupied, not surprisingly, by the Big 4 CA firms – Deloitte, E&Y, KPMG and PWC.
These firms were noted for employing several partners and staff specialists including economists, tax practitioners, legal experts and former officials of the income-tax department. International Tax Review noted that the team available with these firms have a variety of experience and skills and are able to deliver proficient advice in transfer pricing matters.
However, what is heartwarming is that a number of “desi” CA firms were also noted for their path breaking work in transfer pricing matters. T. P. Ostwal & Co came in for special mention for having a “notable presence” in the Indian transfer pricing market. T. P. Ostwal was complimented as a “very knowledgeable and notable” practitioner in this area.
K. C. Mehta & Co also came in for mention as a “key player” of transfer pricing practice in west India and for serving large multinational clients such as Schaeffeler, Panasonic etc.
The other CA firms which came into the radar for their top-quality transfer pricing work were GM Kapadia & Co, Khaitan & Co, MZSK & Associates, Nangia & Co & Majmudar & Partners.
We hope the day is not far when the local CA firms will be able to occupy the “Tier 1” position of transfer pricing advisers in India
Monday, 14 October 2013
Preparation, Validation and e-Filing of e-TDS Return
e-TDS
return has to be prepared in accordance with the file format prescribed by the Income Tax Department. NSDL has
provided free downloadable utility
at http://tin.nsdl.com for the purpose of preparation of e-TDS return. Alternatively, various softwares
are available for preparation of TDS
returns.
Failure to deduct or remit TDS /TCS.
Interest:
Interest at the rates in force
(12% p.a.) from the date on which tax was deductible /collectible to the date of payment to Government
Account is chargeable. The Finance
Act 2010 amended interest rate wef 01.07.2010 and created a separate class of
default in respect of tax deducted
but not paid to levy interest at a higher rate of 1.5 per cent per month, i.e.
18 per cent p.a. as against 1 per cent p.m., i.e. 12 per cent p.a., applicable
in case the tax is deducted late after the due date. The rationale behind this amendment is that the tax
once deducted belongs to the government and the person withholding the same needs to be penalized by
charging higher rate of interest
Penalty equal to the tax that was failed to be deducted/collected or remitted is
leviable.
"Nil TDS Return" no Needs to submit after 01.10.2013 by CPC.
With effect from 01.10.2013 new version of FVU i.e. 4.00 is published by the
TIN-NSDL in place of FVU 3.7 with latest new key features. The latest FVU Ver.
4.00 contains "NIL" TDS/TCS Return
but while generating validation through FVU Ver. 4.00, TDS/TCS statement can not
be filed without quoting any valid
Challan or deductee row. It
means that NIL TDS Return no needs to submit TDS/TCS
Return and thus cpc has also released important
instructions on 07.10.2013 in the interest of deductors about submission of
TDS/TCS return which is as under:
Runways not equivalent to roads
and thus not covered by any exemption notification or any section under the Finance Act, 1994
D.P. Jain Co. Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. vs. CCE, Nagpur. (2013-TILO-1029-CESTAT-MUM)
Facts:
Saturday, 12 October 2013
Transportation of baggage is not an individual or a separate service, but it is a component of the principal service of “Transportation of passengers' service by air”
M/s KINGFISHER TRAINING& AVIATION SERVICES LTD Vs CCE, Mumbai (CESTAT, Mumbai) 2013-TIOL-1463-CESTAT-MUM
Facts of case:
T
Delhi HC rules that nonresident is entitled to concessional rate of 10% on long-term capital gains on sale of shares
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Delhi High Court (HC) in the case of Cairn UK Holdings Ltd. (Taxpayer) on the issue of whether a nonresident (NR) is taxable in India at the concessional rate of 10%, under proviso to Section 112 of the Income Tax Act (ITA), on long-term capital gains from sale of shares of an Indian company in an off–market transaction.
TDS ON SALARY FOR AY 2014-15
Provisions of TDS on Salary as
applicable on Income from Salary
for Financial year 2013-14 / Assessment year 2014-15. This includes how to calculate TDS on Salary for
Financial year 2013-14 and taxability of various components of Salary, Eligible
deduction for Salaried Employees, TDS Due Date and TDS return and deduction
provisions.
INCOME-TAX DEDUCTION FROM SALARIES DURING THE FINANCIAL YEAR 2013-14 Sub : Penal provisions for the members of the Institute who had not complied with their CPE Hours requirements for the block period of 3 years (1-1-2011 to 31-12-2013)
For kind
information of the members
In order to function the system of mandatory CPE effective, the Council of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India has decided that the members who fail to comply with their CPE Hours requirement for the current block of 3 years (1-1-2011 to 31-12-2013) are appropriately sanctioned. Therefore, the Council of the Institute has decided as under :
- All the members are required to complete their CPE hours requirements for the block period of 3 years (1-1-2011 to 31-12-2013) by 31st December, 2013.
- Any shortfall in the CPE credit for the calendar years 2011, 2012 and 2013 should be met by the members by 31st December, 2013.
- The names of the members who fail to comply with their CPE hours Requirements for the block period of 3 years by 31st December, 2013 would be hosted on the website of the ICAI for information of public at large.
- Further, the ICAI will not be responsible in any way for any action taken by any of the regulatory authorities on the basis of the names hosted on the website for allotting the professional work to them as sole proprietor or to their partnership firm.
- To strike out the name/s from the list so hosted on the website, the member/s shall have to make up any shortfall in their CPE credit hours for the above block period of 3 years by obtaining twice of the amount of the shortfall. Such addition shall be in addition to the regular CPE hours requirement for the particular Calendar year in which they are making up the shortfall.
The members are requested to note the above. The members are also requested to comply with the CPE Hours requirements for the current year by 31st December, 2013.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Recommendations of 55th GST council meeting | 21 December 2024
Summary of the relevant updates is provided below for ease of your reference: A) Proposals relating to GST law, Compliances an...
-
PCIT vs. The Executor of Estate of Late Smt. Manjula A. Shah (Bombay High Court) S. 50C Capital Gains: The valuation of the stamp autho...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Supreme Court (SC) [1] on availability of CENVAT Credit on mobile towers and pre-fabrica...
-
IFRS and US GAAP - Similarities and Differences What is IFRS? And what is GAAP? The main difference between IFRS and US GAAP is that G...
-
Madras HC reverses ITAT's order, grants deduction u/s. 80P(2)(a)(i) to assessee (a society engaged in the business of banking and provi...
-
SC dismisses assessee-company’s SLP challenging Bombay HC order upholding re-assessment initiation (beyond 4 yrs period) based on a special...
-
SC dismisses Revenue’s SLP challenging Bombay HC order in case of assessee (belonging to Lodha group of companies engaged in real estate bu...
-
Claiming a foreign tax credit (FTC) in Australia allows companies to offset foreign taxes paid on income earned overseas against their Aust...
-
HC allows HDFC Bank’s writ petition, quashes AO’s order and subsequent reference to TPO alleging that certain related party transactions [p...
-
Delhi ITAT deletes Rs. 1558.57 cr. capital gains addition on Telenor India for AY 2014-15, holds that set off of non-refundable entry fee p...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Bombay High Court (HC)1 on admissibility of input tax credit (ITC) w.r.t GST on advance p...