The CBDT has issued a directive dated 14.08.2014 in which it has expressed concern that officers of the level of DCIT/ACIT are being nominated for representing cases before the Authority of Advance Rulings and that such officers are not able to effectively represent the Departmental view on complex issues. The CBDT has directed that officers below the rank of Addl. CIT/JCIT should not be nominated for representation before the AAR and that in important cases, the representation should be made by the Pr. CIT/ CIT.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
-
In this article, for the benefit of our reader’s we have come up with detailed FAQ on procedures of issuance, requirement of Form 15CA an...
-
Particulars in Part 1 and Part 2 of Step-2 of registration form are required to be exactly the same as reported in the TDS statement. Plea...
-
1. Situation I. Tax Department Summons An employee received a summons from the tax department demanding an explanation for failing to discl...
-
In this post, I will discuss Secretarial Standards related to Proxies under SS – 2. Right to Appoint: A Member entitled to attend and ...
-
Many of us rely on home loans to purchase residential property, but are you fully aware of how tax laws impact your financial strategy? Unde...
-
Summary of the relevant updates is provided below for ease of your reference: A) Proposals relating to GST law, Compliances an...
-
Particulars Singapore Hong Kong Corporate Tax rate 17% 16.5%. Numb...
-
The posting had been move to another website. Please click the link below to get the access of the same. https://taxofindia.wordpress....
-
The circular of the Board dt. 28.06.1965 No. 17 (XL-36), provides for inspection fees and fees for certified copies of assessment and...
No comments:
Post a Comment