HC
directs reversal of input credit against clearance of aluminium castings under
claim of duty remission by buyer for use in specific industrial process, in
terms of Chapter X r/w Rule 57C of Central Excise Rules 1944; Notes
Adjudicating Authority’s finding that assessee was reversing credit initially
but resorted to jugglery subsequently, and since goods cleared under Chapter X
procedure had not suffered any duty payment, MODVAT credit was reversible;
Rejects assessee’s contention that choice of buyer to either claim MODVAT
credit of duty paid or claim remission doesn’t make the goods exempt or
chargeable to nil rate of duty; Relies on Kirloskar Oil Engines decision
wherein it was held that MODVAT Credit in respect of inputs, which have been
used in manufacture of final product that is fully exempted from whole of
excise duty, is not available; States that since assessee had cleared goods
without payment of duty, the case was covered by aforesaid decision, thus
credit taken on aluminium ingots (inputs) was incorrect : Bombay HC
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Big Brother is Counting: How the Taxman Knows About Your Stock Sales and FD Interest
Let’s start with a small story in this regard. Mr. A, a mid-level software engineer, felt incredibly confident about his tax return last...
-
Slump sale is transfer of one or more business undertakings for a lump sum consideration, without assigning individual values to the each...
-
Facts Centrica India Offshore Private Limited (CIO), an Indian Company, is a wholly owned subsidiary of Centrica Plc, UK Centrica Plc a...
-
SREI Infrastructure Finance Ltd vs. ITSC (Delhi High Court) The assessee entered into a scheme of arrangement u/s 391-394 of the Compani...
-
The Tax Audit season has started and it’s the time when the Assessees rush to their Chartered Accountants (CA) to get their Tax Audit d...
-
Facts The taxpayer, a partnership firm, derived income from the business of handling and transport of ship containers, customs clearing a...
-
M/s. Alpha Projects Society P. Ltd vs. DCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad) In AY 2005-06, the assessee made payments to contractors & for professi...
-
01. TDS u/s 194J is required to be done for Royalty also w.e.f 13-7-2006. 02. Royalty had been defined under explanation 2 of se...
-
CIT vs. Kan Construction And Colonizers (P) Ltd (Allahabad High Court) The assessee sold a plot of land for Rs. 79 lakhs. The AO held th...
-
F.No.354/66/2011-TRU Government of India Ministry of Finance Department of Revenue Central Board of Excise & Customs...
-
1. Concept of “limited liability partnership” LLP is an alternative corporate business form that gives the benefits of limited liability ...
No comments:
Post a Comment