HC
holds ‘Swad’ candy as an ayurvedic medicine and not confectionary, thereby
taxable at 6% under Rajasthan Sales Tax Act; Rejects Revenue contention that
since ‘Swad’ candy is freely available at shops other that medical stores, it
cannot be said to be a medicine and hence, taxable at 10%; States that any drug
for prevention of disease or disorder in human beings or animals, and
manufactured exclusively in accordance with the formulae prescribed in
authoritative books, can be said to fall within the definition of a “drug”;
Applying common parlance test and taking note of the ingredients, HC states
that ‘Swad’ cannot be said to be a toffee, as one takes the same in case of a
stomach disorder or for digestion purposes; States that “merely because it is
available in a tea stall or a betel shop or other various places where
confectionery items are sold, does not change the character of an item”, while
noting that no evidence or authoritative material has been put on record by
Revenue so that it can be said to be a confectionery item and not a drug :
Rajasthan HC
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Big Brother is Counting: How the Taxman Knows About Your Stock Sales and FD Interest
Let’s start with a small story in this regard. Mr. A, a mid-level software engineer, felt incredibly confident about his tax return last...
-
Slump sale is transfer of one or more business undertakings for a lump sum consideration, without assigning individual values to the each...
-
Facts Centrica India Offshore Private Limited (CIO), an Indian Company, is a wholly owned subsidiary of Centrica Plc, UK Centrica Plc a...
-
SREI Infrastructure Finance Ltd vs. ITSC (Delhi High Court) The assessee entered into a scheme of arrangement u/s 391-394 of the Compani...
-
The Tax Audit season has started and it’s the time when the Assessees rush to their Chartered Accountants (CA) to get their Tax Audit d...
-
Facts The taxpayer, a partnership firm, derived income from the business of handling and transport of ship containers, customs clearing a...
-
M/s. Alpha Projects Society P. Ltd vs. DCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad) In AY 2005-06, the assessee made payments to contractors & for professi...
-
01. TDS u/s 194J is required to be done for Royalty also w.e.f 13-7-2006. 02. Royalty had been defined under explanation 2 of se...
-
CIT vs. Kan Construction And Colonizers (P) Ltd (Allahabad High Court) The assessee sold a plot of land for Rs. 79 lakhs. The AO held th...
-
F.No.354/66/2011-TRU Government of India Ministry of Finance Department of Revenue Central Board of Excise & Customs...
-
1. Concept of “limited liability partnership” LLP is an alternative corporate business form that gives the benefits of limited liability ...
No comments:
Post a Comment