HC
holds that interest u/s 42 of Delhi VAT Act on refund of VAT amount accrues
after period specified for processing refunds/returns u/s 38(3)(a) and not from
date of filing return; Observes that sub-clauses (i) and (ii) of Section
38(3)(a) mandate refund within 1 or 2 months depending upon tax period (i.e.
monthly or quarterly) and Section 42(1) prescribes simple interest payable on
such refund at a rate notified by Government; Harmonious reading of Sections 38
and 42 clearly indicates that interest is to be paid from the date when same is
due to be paid to assessee or date when excess amount was paid, whichever is
later, and date 'when refund is due' would be the date mentioned in Section 38
(i.e. when refund becomes payable); Remarks, since both Sections 38(3) and
42(1) do not refer to the date of filing of return, same obviously cannot be
the starting point for interest payment, and “Obligation of the assessee to pay
tax and date when tax is payable, and the duty and date on which refund is
payable by the Revenue need not coincide and could be different as per the
statute”; Further, elucidates that, said interpretation is not in conflict with
Section 11 which deals with computation formula to calculate tax payable and
empowers dealer to seek adjustment or refund in case of a negative net
tax : Delhi HC
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
CBDT issues second round of frequently asked questions in relation to Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024
This Tax Alert summarizes Circular No. 19/2024 dated 16 December 2024 (VSV 2- December Circular) issued by the Central Board of Direct Tax...
-
PCIT vs. The Executor of Estate of Late Smt. Manjula A. Shah (Bombay High Court) S. 50C Capital Gains: The valuation of the stamp autho...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Supreme Court (SC) [1] on availability of CENVAT Credit on mobile towers and pre-fabrica...
-
IFRS and US GAAP - Similarities and Differences What is IFRS? And what is GAAP? The main difference between IFRS and US GAAP is that G...
-
Madras HC reverses ITAT's order, grants deduction u/s. 80P(2)(a)(i) to assessee (a society engaged in the business of banking and provi...
-
SC dismisses assessee-company’s SLP challenging Bombay HC order upholding re-assessment initiation (beyond 4 yrs period) based on a special...
-
SC dismisses Revenue’s SLP challenging Bombay HC order in case of assessee (belonging to Lodha group of companies engaged in real estate bu...
-
Claiming a foreign tax credit (FTC) in Australia allows companies to offset foreign taxes paid on income earned overseas against their Aust...
-
HC allows HDFC Bank’s writ petition, quashes AO’s order and subsequent reference to TPO alleging that certain related party transactions [p...
-
Delhi ITAT deletes Rs. 1558.57 cr. capital gains addition on Telenor India for AY 2014-15, holds that set off of non-refundable entry fee p...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Bombay High Court (HC)1 on admissibility of input tax credit (ITC) w.r.t GST on advance p...
No comments:
Post a Comment