HC
dismisses writ petition challenging order passed by Asst. DGFT denying the
benefit of ‘Served from India Scheme’ (SFIS) to assessee rendering hospitality
service, on the premise that it was promoting a foreign brand; Rejects
assessee’s plea that said order lacks jurisdiction and competency and no
fruitful purpose would be served in preferring appeal as Director General
himself had earlier taken a decision contrary to assessee’s interest, which has
been quashed by Delhi HC and therefore, preferring an appeal would be an empty
formality; Perusing Section 15 of FT (D&R) Act, HC elucidates that
provision stipulated thereunder is unambiguous that any decision taken or order
passed by the Adjudicating Authority is appealable u/s 15(1) either before the
Director General or any authorised officer superior to Adjudicating Authority;
Remarks, “Law is an evolving procedure and the pragmatic approach by the Courts
as well as by the authorities are certainly in growing nature. In a developing
nation, the field of law is also being developed by new ideas and
thoughts…..apprehension…that the authority will confine himself only in respect
of the previous decision, cannot be accepted nor shall form a basis for not
exhausting the remedies provided under the Statute”; A decision taken by DGFT at
an earlier occasion will not preclude him from reconsidering issues nor
assessee can come to a conclusion that DGFT is incompetent to re-adjudicate the
issues, observes HC while stating that, “all the intermittent interventions and
the writ petitions filed without exhausting the remedies prescribed under the
Statutes need not be entertained in all circumstances in a routine manner” :
Madras HC
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Bombay High Court Clarifies Tax Exemption Eligibility for Venture Capital Funds
In a significant ruling, the Bombay High Court has reaffirmed that a Venture Capital Fund (VCF) registered with SEBI is entitled to claim ...
-
Slump sale is transfer of one or more business undertakings for a lump sum consideration, without assigning individual values to the each...
-
A new website launched for TDS related matters www.tdscpc.gov.in TRACES – T DS R econciliation A nalysis and C orrection E nabling S yste...
-
Facts Centrica India Offshore Private Limited (CIO), an Indian Company, is a wholly owned subsidiary of Centrica Plc, UK Centrica Plc a...
-
The Tax Audit season has started and it’s the time when the Assessees rush to their Chartered Accountants (CA) to get their Tax Audit d...
-
SREI Infrastructure Finance Ltd vs. ITSC (Delhi High Court) The assessee entered into a scheme of arrangement u/s 391-394 of the Compani...
-
Facts The taxpayer, a partnership firm, derived income from the business of handling and transport of ship containers, customs clearing a...
-
M/s. Alpha Projects Society P. Ltd vs. DCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad) In AY 2005-06, the assessee made payments to contractors & for professi...
-
01. TDS u/s 194J is required to be done for Royalty also w.e.f 13-7-2006. 02. Royalty had been defined under explanation 2 of se...
-
F.No.354/66/2011-TRU Government of India Ministry of Finance Department of Revenue Central Board of Excise & Customs...
-
M/s. Merilyn Shipping & Transports vs. ACIT (ITAT Visakhapatnam Special Bench) The assessee incurred brokerage expenses of Rs.38....
No comments:
Post a Comment