National Anti-profiteering
Authority drops the proceedings instituted by purchaser (applicant) of
Schindler elevators, absent violation of provisions of Section 171 of CGST Act
by manufacturer (respondent); Finds that applicant had been charged appropriate
service tax on the advance paid before July 1, 2017 but as installation of
elevator had been completed after coming into force of CGST Act, was charged
GST at prevalent rate under separate invoices; Moreover, accepts DG Safeguards’
finding that since all material was delivered before June 30, 2017,
manufacturer was not in a position to pass any benefit by deducting excise duty
from final GST charged; Notes applicant’s request for withdrawal of application
citing inadequate understanding of GST provisions and subsequent clarifications
pertaining to issue raised : NAA
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
GST Litigation Update: Key Judicial and Advance Rulings
High Court: Interest Refund Allowed on Subsequent Realisation of Export Proceeds In Ernst and Young LLP v. UOI (2026-VIL-1215-P&H) , t...
-
A new website launched for TDS related matters www.tdscpc.gov.in TRACES – T DS R econciliation A nalysis and C orrection E nabling S yste...
-
Slump sale is transfer of one or more business undertakings for a lump sum consideration, without assigning individual values to the each...
-
CIT vs. The Instalment Supply Ltd (Delhi High Court) The assessee bought 1614 items of computer systems for Rs.40 lacs from HCL Hewlett ...
-
Key features of File Validation Utility (FVU) version 3.3 FVU 3.3 will be applicable for quarterly TDS/ TCS statements pertaining to...
-
SREI Infrastructure Finance Ltd vs. ITSC (Delhi High Court) The assessee entered into a scheme of arrangement u/s 391-394 of the Compani...
-
01. TDS u/s 194J is required to be done for Royalty also w.e.f 13-7-2006. 02. Royalty had been defined under explanation 2 of se...
-
Facts Centrica India Offshore Private Limited (CIO), an Indian Company, is a wholly owned subsidiary of Centrica Plc, UK Centrica Plc a...
-
Facts The applicant („A‟) is a closely held Public Limited company incorporated in India in the year 1953. A‟s shareholder included A (...
-
Until now, 'Samaritans' is not how the Independent Directors are purported by Clause 49 in the Listing agreement. An Independ...
-
THE issues before the Bench are - Whether benefits of Sec 80IA(4) are available only to a company and not to persons like HUF, firm and Ind...
No comments:
Post a Comment