Friday, 21 September 2018

HC : Calculates compounding fee @100% of 'tax' evaded, not on income addition

Gujarat HC rules that compounding fees should be levied @ 100% of ‘tax’ sought to be evaded and not @ 100% of ‘income addition’ with respect to prosecution initiated on assessee co. u/s 276C; Notes that para 12 of CBDT’s latest guidelines of December, 2014 on compounding of offences prescribes compounding fees for offense u/s 276C(1) at 100% of the ‘amount sought to be evaded’; Since this para does not contain any specification of ‘the amount sought to be evaded’, HC remarks that “we may fall back on the statutory provisions in relation to which, this compounding fee is prescribed.”; Notes that Sec. 276C links the severity of punishment on the amount sought to be evaded and thus, in turn has relation to the attempt at evasion of tax, penalty or interest; Accordingly, HC concludes that “when the CBDT circular refers to the amount sought to be evaded, it must be seen and understood in light of the provisions contained in section 276C(1) and in turn must be seen as amount sought to be evaded.…”:HC 

No comments:

Employees Provident Fund wage ceiling increased from INR15,000 to INR25,000 per month

The Ministry of Labour and Employment has notified revised wage ceiling of ₹25,000 per month for the purposes of Chapter III (Provident Fund...