Delhi ITAT grants deduction
for provision in respect of price reduction on set top boxes for subject AY
2007-08, notes that price reduction was crystallized after March 31st of
relevant year but before the finalization of financial statements; During
relevant AY, assessee company had sold set top boxes to Tata Sky Ltd. at the
price agreed as per the MOU dated January, 2006, however, owing to reduction in
duties announced by Union Budget w.e.f. March 1, 2007, there was a retrospective
reduction in the price as agreed between the parties vide letter dated August,
2007; Rejects Revenue’s stand that post facto adjustment to sales receipt
cannot be accepted since price reduction was crystallized after the closure of
the relevant year; ITAT observes that the provision for price reduction
pertained to the set top boxes sold during relevant year, notes that though the
exact price reduction happened post 31st March, 2007, it was in principle
agreed before March 31st (i.e. at the time of Union budget); Further in view of
AS-4 and mercantile system of accounting followed by assessee, ITAT holds that
costs directly associated with the revenue recognized during the relevant
period, irrespective of whether the money paid or not, have to be considered,
lastly clarifies that if the deduction is not allowed in subject AY, the same
has to be allowed in subsequent AY:ITAT
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Bombay High Court Clarifies Tax Exemption Eligibility for Venture Capital Funds
In a significant ruling, the Bombay High Court has reaffirmed that a Venture Capital Fund (VCF) registered with SEBI is entitled to claim ...
-
Slump sale is transfer of one or more business undertakings for a lump sum consideration, without assigning individual values to the each...
-
A new website launched for TDS related matters www.tdscpc.gov.in TRACES – T DS R econciliation A nalysis and C orrection E nabling S yste...
-
Facts Centrica India Offshore Private Limited (CIO), an Indian Company, is a wholly owned subsidiary of Centrica Plc, UK Centrica Plc a...
-
The Tax Audit season has started and it’s the time when the Assessees rush to their Chartered Accountants (CA) to get their Tax Audit d...
-
SREI Infrastructure Finance Ltd vs. ITSC (Delhi High Court) The assessee entered into a scheme of arrangement u/s 391-394 of the Compani...
-
Facts The taxpayer, a partnership firm, derived income from the business of handling and transport of ship containers, customs clearing a...
-
M/s. Alpha Projects Society P. Ltd vs. DCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad) In AY 2005-06, the assessee made payments to contractors & for professi...
-
01. TDS u/s 194J is required to be done for Royalty also w.e.f 13-7-2006. 02. Royalty had been defined under explanation 2 of se...
-
F.No.354/66/2011-TRU Government of India Ministry of Finance Department of Revenue Central Board of Excise & Customs...
-
M/s. Merilyn Shipping & Transports vs. ACIT (ITAT Visakhapatnam Special Bench) The assessee incurred brokerage expenses of Rs.38....
No comments:
Post a Comment