Kerala HC confirms ITAT
order, holds that failure to consider assessee trust's application for
registration within stipulated period of 6 months would result in deemed grant
of registration, but such registration is effective from date of expiry of 6
months from application date; HC finds Revenue’s request to interpret relevant
provisions as done by Full Bench of Allahabad HC in Muzafar Nagar Development Authority
(wherein it was held that non-disposal of application cannot result into deemed
registration) as persuasive; However observes that it was obliged to follow SC
decision upholding Allahabad HC decision in Society for the promotion of
Education, Adventure Sport & Conservation of Environment, holds that “The
opinion as expressed by the Allahabad High Court, regarding deemed registration
.. having not been differed from by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the Civil
Appeal; the declaration by the High Court assumes the authority of a precedent
by the Hon'ble Supreme Court on the principles of doctrine of merger”; Reject
Revenue’s contention that SC decision is not declaration of law as it was based
on concession from Department Counsel, notes that only apprehension raised by
Department before SC was about effective date of deemed registration; Also
takes note of CBDT Instruction No. 16/2015 which stated that requirement to
pass order granting or rejecting registration within 6 months is a mandatory
requirement.:HC
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Bombay High Court Clarifies Tax Exemption Eligibility for Venture Capital Funds
In a significant ruling, the Bombay High Court has reaffirmed that a Venture Capital Fund (VCF) registered with SEBI is entitled to claim ...
-
Slump sale is transfer of one or more business undertakings for a lump sum consideration, without assigning individual values to the each...
-
A new website launched for TDS related matters www.tdscpc.gov.in TRACES – T DS R econciliation A nalysis and C orrection E nabling S yste...
-
Facts Centrica India Offshore Private Limited (CIO), an Indian Company, is a wholly owned subsidiary of Centrica Plc, UK Centrica Plc a...
-
The Tax Audit season has started and it’s the time when the Assessees rush to their Chartered Accountants (CA) to get their Tax Audit d...
-
SREI Infrastructure Finance Ltd vs. ITSC (Delhi High Court) The assessee entered into a scheme of arrangement u/s 391-394 of the Compani...
-
Facts The taxpayer, a partnership firm, derived income from the business of handling and transport of ship containers, customs clearing a...
-
M/s. Alpha Projects Society P. Ltd vs. DCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad) In AY 2005-06, the assessee made payments to contractors & for professi...
-
01. TDS u/s 194J is required to be done for Royalty also w.e.f 13-7-2006. 02. Royalty had been defined under explanation 2 of se...
-
F.No.354/66/2011-TRU Government of India Ministry of Finance Department of Revenue Central Board of Excise & Customs...
-
M/s. Merilyn Shipping & Transports vs. ACIT (ITAT Visakhapatnam Special Bench) The assessee incurred brokerage expenses of Rs.38....
No comments:
Post a Comment