Punjab and Haryana HC
deletes addition towards interest due on Non performing Assets (NPA) of
co-operative bank (assessee) for AY 2009-10; Rejects Revenue’s stand that in
view of specific provisions of Sec 43D which excluded from its purview,
entities like assessee at relevant time, assessee cannot indirectly claim
benefit to Sec 43D and thus, interest on NPA was taxable on accrual
basis u/s 145; Relying on SC decision in Southern Technologies case, notes that
RBI Directions 1998 are essentially income recognition norms and they “..have
nothing to do with the accounting treatment or taxability of income under the
Act and the two, viz. the Act and the RBI Directions, 1998 operate in different
fields”; However also observes that “Assessing Officer has to follow the RBI
Directions 1998 in view of Section 45Q of the 1934 Act. Hence, as far as Income
Recognition is concerned, Section 145 of the Act has no role to play in the
present dispute”; Also takes note of various judicial precedents such as
in case of Southern Technologies, UCO Bank, Vasisth Chay Vyapar Ltd wherein
‘real income theory’ was upheld as per which “notwithstanding that the assessee
may be following the mercantile system of accounting, it can be taxed on real
income and not accrued interest which is hypothetical income.:HC
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Bombay High Court Clarifies Tax Exemption Eligibility for Venture Capital Funds
In a significant ruling, the Bombay High Court has reaffirmed that a Venture Capital Fund (VCF) registered with SEBI is entitled to claim ...
-
Slump sale is transfer of one or more business undertakings for a lump sum consideration, without assigning individual values to the each...
-
A new website launched for TDS related matters www.tdscpc.gov.in TRACES – T DS R econciliation A nalysis and C orrection E nabling S yste...
-
Facts Centrica India Offshore Private Limited (CIO), an Indian Company, is a wholly owned subsidiary of Centrica Plc, UK Centrica Plc a...
-
The Tax Audit season has started and it’s the time when the Assessees rush to their Chartered Accountants (CA) to get their Tax Audit d...
-
SREI Infrastructure Finance Ltd vs. ITSC (Delhi High Court) The assessee entered into a scheme of arrangement u/s 391-394 of the Compani...
-
Facts The taxpayer, a partnership firm, derived income from the business of handling and transport of ship containers, customs clearing a...
-
M/s. Alpha Projects Society P. Ltd vs. DCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad) In AY 2005-06, the assessee made payments to contractors & for professi...
-
01. TDS u/s 194J is required to be done for Royalty also w.e.f 13-7-2006. 02. Royalty had been defined under explanation 2 of se...
-
F.No.354/66/2011-TRU Government of India Ministry of Finance Department of Revenue Central Board of Excise & Customs...
-
M/s. Merilyn Shipping & Transports vs. ACIT (ITAT Visakhapatnam Special Bench) The assessee incurred brokerage expenses of Rs.38....
No comments:
Post a Comment